Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
[Transradial approach and kidney disease]
1Service de cardiologie interventionnelle, groupe hospitalier mutualiste, 8, rue Docteur-Calmette, 38000 Grenoble, France. b.faurie@ghm-grenoble.fr
Insights
Transradial approach may be safe for patients with chronic kidney disease, reducing vascular complications and mortality. Further studies are needed to compare radial versus femoral access in this high-risk group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Nephrology
- Interventional Cardiology
Context:
- Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face elevated cardiovascular risks.
- Aging populations and diabetes increase CKD prevalence and associated mortality.
- Transradial approach is often avoided in CKD patients due to concerns about radial artery suitability for future arteriovenous fistulas.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transradial approach in patients with chronic kidney disease.
- To compare the risks of vascular complications between transradial and transfemoral access in CKD patients.
- To determine if the transradial approach can be safely utilized in CKD patients, even those on hemodialysis.
Summary:
- The transradial approach, despite traditional contraindications in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, may offer significant benefits.
- It dramatically reduces vascular bleeding complications compared to transfemoral access, leading to fewer adverse events and lower mortality, particularly in high-risk CKD subgroups.
- The risk of vascular complications from transfemoral access may outweigh the concern of potential radial artery injury for future arteriovenous fistula creation in CKD patients.
Impact:
- The transradial approach could be a viable option for CKD patients, improving procedural safety and outcomes.
- This approach may reduce overall mortality in high-risk CKD patients undergoing vascular procedures.
- Further large-scale randomized trials are essential to definitively compare radial and femoral access strategies in the CKD population.
Abstract:
Patients with chronic kidney disease have a high cardiovascular risk and mortality. This problem is growing because of the aging of the population and prevalence of diabetes. Transradial approach is traditionally prohibited due to the injury that catheterization induces on this artery that could possibly influence its suitability as an arteriovenous fistula. Paradoxically, the increased risk of major vascular complications with femoral access leads to transgress this rule. Indeed, transradial approach by reducing dramatically the rate of vascular bleeding complications leads to a significant reduction of adverse events and mortality, especially in the high cardiovascular risk sub-group. In patients with chronic kidney disease, choice of vascular access site should compare the potentially fatal risk of vascular complications with the one of traumatizing the artery needed to create a distal hemodialysis access site. Thus, chronic renal insufficiency even on hemodialysis should not be an absolute contraindication to radial approach, which could be used individually by a skilled team and in a mini-invasive spirit. A large randomised study comparing radial and femoral access in this population is needed.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction

