Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Therapeutic implications of low lymphocyte count in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes
Julio Núñez1, Juan Sanchis, Vicent Bodí
1Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. yulnunez@gmail.com
Insights
Low lymphocyte count (LLC) indicates a higher risk of myocardial infarction (MI) after non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). Invasive revascularization strategy significantly reduces MI risk in these patients compared to conservative care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Inflammation Research
Background:
- Low lymphocyte count (LLC) is linked to inflammation and adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
- Identifying optimal treatment strategies for high-risk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) is crucial.
- The benefit of invasive revascularization strategy versus conservative strategy in NSTEACS patients with LLC is not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if high-risk NSTEACS patients with LLC experience a greater reduction in long-term post-discharge myocardial infarction (MI) with an invasive revascularization strategy (RIS) compared to conservative strategy (CS).
Main Methods:
- A total of 972 high-risk NSTEACS patients were analyzed.
- Patients were treated with either CS (n=345) or RIS (n=627).
- LLC was defined as lymphocyte count <= 1200 cells/ml. Cox regression was used to assess the association between revascularization strategy and MI, stratified by LLC status.
Main Results:
- At 3-year follow-up, 13.9% of patients experienced MI.
- In multivariable analysis, patients with LLC showed a significantly greater reduction in MI risk with RIS (HR: 0.40; p=0.003).
- No significant difference in MI rates was observed between RIS and CS in patients without LLC.
Conclusions:
- LLC identifies a specific subgroup of NSTEACS patients who benefit from an invasive revascularization strategy.
- RIS leads to a greater reduction in post-discharge MI risk for NSTEACS patients with LLC.
- The findings support personalized treatment approaches based on inflammatory markers in acute coronary syndromes.
Background:
Low lymphocyte count (LLC), a surrogate for inflammation, has emerged as a potential risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes, especially new ischemic events. To identify patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who benefit from an invasive revascularization strategy remains a challenge. We sought to determine if patients with high-risk NSTEACS who exhibited LLC have a greater reduction in long-term post-discharge myocardial infarction (MI) when managed under a revascularization invasive strategy (RIS) as compared with conservative strategy (CS).
Methods:
Nine hundred seventy two consecutive patients with high-risk NSTEACS were treated under two revascularization strategies (RS): 1) CS, from January 2001 to October 2002 (345 patients; 35.5%) and 2) RIS, from November 2002 to May 2005 (627 patients; 64.5%). LLC was defined as lymphocytes count < or =1200 cells/ml (1 vs. 2-4 quartiles). The association between the type of RS and MI was stratified by lymphocyte count status and assessed by Cox regression adapted for competing events.
Results:
At 3-year follow-up, 145 deaths (14.9%), 135 MI (13.9%) and 76 revascularization procedures (7.8%) were registered. In a multivariable setting, LLC patients exhibited a greater MI risk reduction when managed under RIS (HR: 0.40; 95% CI=0.22-0.72, p=0.003). Conversely, when LLC was not present, no difference in the rate of MI was detected between the two RS.
Conclusions:
LLC identifies a subgroup of patients with greater reduction in the risk of postdischarge MI when a RIS is applied.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care