Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phenyllactic Acid Restores Intestinal Epithelial Barrier to Alleviate Hypertriglyceridemic Acute Pancreatitis via a PPARγ-Dependent Mechanism.

Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Gut-microbiota-derived 3-indoleacrylic acid alleviates neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis by inhibiting epithelial necroptosis.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Nisin and Cultured Dextrose as Clean Label Preservatives in Braised Chicken Breast: Antibacterial Activity and Quality Preservation.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Correction: MiR-198 represses tumor growth and metastasis in colorectal cancer by targeting fucosyl transferase 8.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Integration of Electrical Heating and Infrared-Reflection with Connected Ag Network for Personal Thermal Management.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025
Same author

Biomimetic Nanochannel Nanofibers with Enhanced Superhydrophilicity for Efficient Moisture-Wicking Fabrics.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurements on Mouse Sciatic Nerves
11:07

In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurements on Mouse Sciatic Nerves

Published on: April 13, 2014

Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements derived entirely by computer methods.

Xuan Kong1, Eugene A Lesser, Shai N Gozani

  • 1NeuroMetrix, Inc 62 Fourth Avenue, Waltham, MA, USA. xkong@neurometrix.com

Biomedical Engineering Online
|November 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Computer-based nerve conduction studies show high repeatability, comparable to manual methods. Latency measurements are most reliable, while amplitude measurements are least reliable.

More Related Videos

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
12:09

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat

Published on: April 18, 2020

Use of In Vivo Single-fiber Recording and Intact Dorsal Root Ganglion with Attached Sciatic Nerve to Examine the Mechanism of Conduction Failure
09:34

Use of In Vivo Single-fiber Recording and Intact Dorsal Root Ganglion with Attached Sciatic Nerve to Examine the Mechanism of Conduction Failure

Published on: August 27, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurements on Mouse Sciatic Nerves
11:07

In Vivo Electrophysiological Measurements on Mouse Sciatic Nerves

Published on: April 13, 2014

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat
12:09

Functional and Physiological Methods of Evaluating Median Nerve Regeneration in the Rat

Published on: April 18, 2020

Use of In Vivo Single-fiber Recording and Intact Dorsal Root Ganglion with Attached Sciatic Nerve to Examine the Mechanism of Conduction Failure
09:34

Use of In Vivo Single-fiber Recording and Intact Dorsal Root Ganglion with Attached Sciatic Nerve to Examine the Mechanism of Conduction Failure

Published on: August 27, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Nerve conduction studies (NCS) are crucial for diagnosing neuropathies, providing objective peripheral nerve function data.
  • This study assesses the reliability of NCS parameters obtained using automated computer-based data acquisition and waveform analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the reliability of nerve conduction parameters derived from computer-based measurements.
  • To quantify the sources of variability in these electrodiagnostic tests.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated 29 volunteers across 5 nerves bilaterally over two sessions.
  • Measured motor and sensory latencies, conduction velocities (CV), compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes, and F-wave latencies.
  • Utilized variance component analysis, coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and relative interval variation (RIV).

Main Results:

  • Latency and CV parameters exhibited low between-session CoVs (4.2%–9.8%).
  • Amplitude parameters showed higher between-session CoVs (15.6%–19.8%).
  • Between-test CoVs were significantly lower than between-session CoVs, except for F-wave latencies.

Conclusions:

  • Modern electrodiagnostic instruments with computer-based cursor assignment yield highly repeatable NCS parameters.
  • The reliability is comparable to manual measurements in multi-center trials.
  • F-wave latencies demonstrate superior reproducibility, while amplitudes are less reproducible, consistent with established findings.