Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessing Therapeutic Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Hindlimb Ischemia
Published on: June 8, 2019
Ischemia is the critical determinant of revascularization benefit: an interventionalist's perspective of the COURAGE
1The Christ Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous catheter interventions (PCI) for coronary artery disease reduce restenosis but not consistently death or heart attack. Reducing myocardial ischemia magnitude improves revascularization benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Percutaneous catheter-based interventions (PCI) for coronary artery disease have advanced, reducing restenosis.
- However, consistent reductions in death or myocardial infarction (MI) have not been observed across different devices or compared to medical therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relationship between myocardial ischemia and the benefits of revascularization for chronic stable coronary disease.
- To compare the effectiveness of PCI versus medical therapy in reducing ischemia and improving clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- The study reviews existing data on PCI outcomes, including balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents, and drug-eluting stents (DES).
- It correlates objective evidence of myocardial ischemia, regardless of detection method, with the occurrence of death and nonfatal MI.
- The effectiveness of PCI in reducing ischemia is compared to medical therapy alone.
Main Results:
- Myocardial ischemia magnitude is directly proportional to the benefit gained from revascularization (reduction in death or MI).
- PCI is more effective than medical therapy alone in reducing myocardial ischemia.
- Advances in PCI technology (DES) and pharmacology have enhanced the magnitude and durability of PCI benefits.
Conclusions:
- Objective evidence of myocardial ischemia is a key predictor of outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease.
- PCI, particularly with DES and improved pharmacology, offers greater benefits in reducing ischemia and improving outcomes compared to medical therapy alone.
- Reducing ischemia is crucial for maximizing the benefits of revascularization in coronary artery disease management.
Abstract:
Although advances in percutaneous catheter-based interventions (PCI) for coronary artery disease have been associated with reductions in angiographic as well as clinical restenosis, no consistent reduction in the occurrence of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) has been observed either between devices (balloon vs bare-metal stent vs drug-eluting stent [DES]) or between device and medically treated patients with chronic stable coronary disease. Objective evidence of myocardial ischemia--irrespective of the methodology used to demonstrate its presence--is qualitatively and quantitatively related to the occurrence of death and/or nonfatal MI. The magnitude of ischemia is directly proportional to the magnitude of revascularization benefit (reduction in death or MI). Revascularization by PCI is more effective in reducing ischemia than medical therapy alone. The evolution of both PCI technology (DES) and adjunctive pharmacology has improved the relative magnitude and durability of PCI benefit compared with medical therapy alone.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and narrowing...
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
