Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An education with audit and targeted feedback intervention to de-implement preoperative surgical urine cultures: a multi-center quasi-experimental study.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026
Same author

Semaglutide and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: An OHDSI Network Study.

Ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Enhancing Selection and Surveillance of Surgical Meshes in Inguinal Hernia Repair.

JAMA surgery·2025
Same author

Acceptability of proposed stewardship interventions to reduce preoperative screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria.

American journal of infection control·2025
Same author

Does Routine Urine Culture Testing Before Endoscopic Prostate Surgery Decrease Postoperative Urinary Tract Infection? An Analysis of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Urology practice·2025
Same author

Drug-Gene Interactions and Clinical Outcomes After Vascular Surgery in the Million Veteran Program.

JAMA surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides.

Won-suk Oh1, Il-Woong Koh, William J O'Brien

  • 1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078, USA. ohws@umich.edu

Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany : 1985)
|November 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary

The Vitapan 3D Master shade guide improved interobserver agreement in visual tooth shade matching compared to the Vitapan Classical guide. Selecting a common shade among the top three choices significantly enhanced agreement between dentists.

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Color Science in Dentistry
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Accurate visual shade matching is crucial for aesthetic dental restorations.
  • Interobserver variability in shade selection can lead to discrepancies in restoration color.
  • Existing shade guides may have limitations in facilitating consistent shade selection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare interobserver agreement in visual shade matching using two different shade guides.
  • To assess the precision of color discrimination in dental shade selection.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the Vitapan 3D Master versus the Vitapan Classical shade guide.

Main Methods:

  • Two prosthodontists independently performed visual shade matching on 33 subjects using Vitapan Classical and Vitapan 3D Master shade guides.
  • The three closest shade tabs were selected and ranked.
  • Interobserver agreement was calculated by comparing the best and common shades; CIE Lab color difference (DeltaE*) was computed.

Main Results:

  • Interobserver agreement for the best shade match was 30%, increasing to over 85% for the common shade.
  • No significant difference in mean color difference between the two shade guides.
  • The Vitapan 3D Master guide reduced interobserver color differences from 0.8 to 0.2 compared to the Vitapan Classical guide.

Conclusions:

  • Visual shade matching demonstrates improved agreement with the Vitapan 3D Master shade guide.
  • Selecting a common shade from the closest three identified by multiple observers enhances agreement.
  • The Vitapan 3D Master guide offers superior performance in reducing interobserver variability in dental shade selection.