Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Birth weight and health and developmental outcomes in US children, 1997-2005
Sheree L Boulet1, Laura A Schieve, Coleen A Boyle
1National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-D02, Atlanta, GA, 30333. USA, sboulet@cdc.gov
Insights
Children with normal birth weights between 2,500-2,999g had higher risks for developmental disabilities and special education services compared to those born 3,500-3,999g. This highlights the need to study the full birth weight spectrum for developmental outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Health
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Public Health
Background:
- Birth weight is a critical factor influencing child development and health outcomes.
- Previous research has primarily focused on the risks associated with low and very low birth weight.
- The full spectrum of birth weight and its association with developmental disabilities requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between the complete distribution of birth weight and the prevalence of developmental disabilities (DDs) in US children.
- To assess the association between birth weight categories and the utilization of health services and special education.
- To identify specific DDs and service utilization patterns across various birth weight ranges.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the 1997-2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Sample Child Core, including 87,578 children aged 3-17.
- Analyzed parent-reported birth weight and information on developmental disabilities and health service utilization.
- Calculated adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for demographic factors to determine associations between birth weight and outcomes.
Main Results:
- A trend of decreasing disability prevalence with increasing birth weight was observed, up to a plateau.
- Children with birth weights of 2,500-2,999g showed higher odds for mental retardation, cerebral palsy, learning disability, ADHD, and other developmental delays compared to those weighing 3,500-3,999g.
- Increased likelihood of receiving special education services was also noted in the 2,500-2,999g birth weight group.
Conclusions:
- Findings indicate that even children with 'normal' birth weights within the 2,500-2,999g range face elevated risks for certain developmental disabilities and special education needs.
- The study suggests that a continuous examination of the full birth weight distribution, not just extremes, is crucial for understanding developmental outcomes.
- Further research is warranted to explore the continuous relationship between birth weight and child health and developmental trajectories.
Abstract:
The primary goal of this study was to assess the association between the full birth weight distribution and prevalence of specific developmental disabilities and related measures of health and special education services utilization in US children. Using data from the 1997-2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Sample Child Core, we identified 87,578 children 3-17 years of age with parent-reported information on birth weight. We estimated the prevalences of DDs (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], autism, cerebral palsy, hearing impairment, learning disability without mental retardation, mental retardation, seizures, stuttering/stammering, and other developmental delay) and several indicators of health services utilization within a range of birth weight categories. We calculated odds ratios adjusted for demographic factors (AOR). We observed trends of decreasing disability/indicator prevalence with increasing birth weight up to a plateau. Although associations were strongest for very low birth weight, children with "normal" birth weights of 2,500-2,999 g were more likely than those with birth weights of 3,500-3,999 g to have mental retardation (AOR 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6]), cerebral palsy (AOR 2.4 [95% CI: 1.5-3.8]), learning disability without mental retardation (AOR 1.2 [95% CI: 1.1-1.4]), ADHD (AOR 1.2 [95% CI: 1.1-1.3]), and other developmental delay (AOR 1.3 [95% CI: 1.1-1.5]) and to receive special education services (AOR 1.3 [95% CI: 1.2-1.5]). While much research has focused on the health and developmental outcomes of low and very low birth weight children, these findings suggest that additional study of a continuous range of birth weights may be warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Nature and Nurture
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Development of Human Microbiota

