Biomechanical evaluation of 3-part proximal humerus fractures: a cadaveric study

Proximal humerus fractures occur frequently, and treatment remains controversial. This study compares stiffness in axial loading for 3 methods of fixation (locking compression plate, standard (nonlocking) proximal humerus plate, and blade plate) in a 3-part proximal humerus fracture model. Twelve paired proximal humeri were obtained from embalmed human cadavers and separated into 3 groups. Osteotomies of the surgical neck and greater tuberosity were created to simulate a 3-part proximal humerus fracture. After fixation, constructs were axially loaded in 20 degrees of abduction for 200 cycles in an Instron materials testing machine (Norwood, Massachusetts). The blade plate (mean, 146.87+/-28.9 N/mm) demonstrated 29% more mean stiffness than the standard plate (mean, 113.0+/-22.3 N/mm; P=.19). The locking compression plate (mean, 130.71+/-39.2 N/mm) exhibited 15% greater stiffness compared to the standard plate in our 3-part model (P=.58). The blade plate demonstrated 12% greater stiffness than the locking compression plate (P=.64). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the fixed-angle devices and the standard plate. Future in vitro and clinical studies of plate devices for proximal humerus fractures would be worthwhile to determine the benefits and limitations of various implants for specific types of fractures, including clinical performance and cost of care.