Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...

Behrens–Fisher Test

Behrens–Fisher Test

The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test is...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Knowledge and perception of dementia risk and protective factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2026

Same author

House dust mite allergen avoidance strategies for the treatment of allergic asthma: A hypothesis-generating meta-analysis.

The World Allergy Organization journal·2024

Same author

NT-proBNP for Predicting All-Cause Death and Heart Transplant in Children and Adults with Heart Failure.

Pediatric cardiology·2024

Same author

Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Treated With Revascularization.

Circulation·2024

Same author

Effective sample size: A measure of individual uncertainty in predictions.

Statistics in medicine·2024

Same author

Progressive Left Ventricular Remodeling for Predicting Mortality in Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: The Pediatric Cardiomyopathy Registry.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.

Taye H Hamza¹, Lidia R Arends, Hans C van Houwelingen

¹Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC - Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. thh02@health.state.ny.us

BMC Medical Research Methodology

|November 12, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a multivariate random effects meta-analysis for diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds. This approach fully utilizes data, avoiding information loss from dichotomizing results.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Medical Informatics
Epidemiology

Background:

Bivariate random effects meta-analysis is standard for diagnostic tests with single thresholds.
Existing methods often simplify multi-threshold data, leading to information loss.
This simplification hinders a comprehensive analysis of diagnostic test performance across various thresholds.

Purpose of the Study:

To generalize bivariate random effects meta-analysis for diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.
To develop a method that fully exploits available data from studies with varying test positivity thresholds.
To provide a framework for more accurate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

Main Methods:

Generalizing the bivariate random effects model to accommodate k thresholds per study (2x(k+1) table).
Utilizing a multivariate random effects approach, assuming study-specific ROC curves are randomly sampled.
Fitting the model using standard likelihood procedures in statistical packages like SAS (Proc NLMIXED).

Main Results:

The proposed multivariate model allows for the description of study-specific ROC curves.
Models can be readily extended to incorporate study-level covariates for deeper insights.
The method is demonstrated with published meta-analysis data, with SAS code provided.

Conclusions:

The multivariate random effects meta-analysis is a suitable and practical framework for studies with multiple thresholds.
This approach prevents information loss associated with dichotomizing test results.
It offers a more complete and accurate method for synthesizing evidence from diagnostic test accuracy studies.