Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal patterns of smartphone-mediated digital engagement and mental health symptomatology.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The Impact of Sunlight and Artificial Light at Night on Sleep Stages: Evidence From a 7-Day Sensor-Based Observational Study.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth·2026
Same author

Mental health in a digitally fragmented world: Exploring negative and positive associations across spatial contexts and gender.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same author

The impact of stress on sleep architecture: A seven-day study leveraging a psychophysiological stress detection algorithm and wearable EEG.

Sleep health·2026
Same author

Investigation of sociodemographic, temporal, and meteorological heterogeneity in the short-term blood pressure response to air pollutants.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2026
Same author

Momentary associations between time-varying social contacts and depressive symptomatology in older adults: A GPS-based mobility survey study.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Neighborhood-level confounding in epidemiologic studies: unavoidable challenges, uncertain solutions.

Basile Chaix1, Cinira Leal, David Evans

  • 1Inserm, U707, Research Unit in Epidemiology, Information Systems, and Modeling, Paris, France. chaix@u707.jussieu.fr

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|November 13, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Neighborhood socioeconomic factors can confound studies on specific environmental health effects. Researchers should adjust for these factors, acknowledging potential biases like collider bias, and use causal diagrams to interpret results.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Environmental epidemiology
  • Social determinants of health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Early neighborhood studies focused on overall influences, not specific components.
  • Shifting focus to specific environmental factors necessitates addressing neighborhood-level confounding.
  • Failure to account for confounding can lead to biased health associations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight neighborhood socioeconomic position as a key confounder in environmental health studies.
  • To discuss the implications of controlling for neighborhood socioeconomic position.
  • To recommend strategies for interpreting adjusted associations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of confounding in neighborhood-level health research.
  • Discussion of adjustment strategies for neighborhood socioeconomic position.
  • Proposal for using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to assess bias.

Main Results:

  • Neighborhood socioeconomic position is a significant source of confounding for specific environmental exposures.
  • Controlling for neighborhood socioeconomic position carries risks of overadjustment and collider bias.
  • Adjustment may obscure or falsely explain associations.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers should conduct complementary analyses adjusting for neighborhood socioeconomic position.
  • DAGs are crucial for distinguishing confounding from other biases after adjustment.
  • Careful interpretation is needed to understand the true impact of environmental factors on health.