Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of the Mindfulness Self-Compassionate Care program: a randomized controlled trial to address dementia caregiver stress.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

A rapid molecular test for gonorrhea and chlamydia compared to Gram stain for symptomatic patients in a specialized STI clinic: a randomized controlled trial.

Sexually transmitted diseases·2026
Same author

Quantifying brain-age gap in people with HIV on antiretroviral therapy using plasma neurofilament light chain.

AIDS (London, England)·2026
Same author

Healthy aging as Black adults, in it together (HABIT): Protocol for a comparative effectiveness trial to address comorbid chronic pain and early cognitive decline among older, community-based Black adults.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

"We can do this. That I learned.": A nonrandomized open pilot of Resilient Together for Dementia, a post-diagnosis dyadic intervention.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Dementia Care Specialists' Perspectives of Diagnosis and Early Psychosocial Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Focus Groups in Two Large Academic Medical Centers.

Journal of aging research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Testing for qualitative interactions between stages in an adaptive study.

Robert A Parker1

  • 1Truth, Ltd., 3311 Blue Ridge Court, Westlake Village, CA 91362, USA. Bob.Parker@truthltd.com

Statistics in Medicine
|November 13, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Standard tests for qualitative interactions in adaptive trials are too conservative. This study introduces a new method using minimum detectable effect to better identify important treatment heterogeneity across trial stages.

More Related Videos

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
05:03

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
06:41

Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors

Published on: February 25, 2011

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes
05:03

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice
07:38

Strategies for Assessing Autistic-Like Behaviors in Mice

Published on: September 20, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacovigilance

Background:

  • Treatment efficacy decisions rely on risk-benefit balance.
  • Heterogeneity in treatment effects across patient groups can alter clinical utility.
  • Quantitative and qualitative treatment interactions are not strictly dichotomous.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate existing tests for qualitative treatment interactions in adaptive trials.
  • To propose a new framework for identifying significant heterogeneity between trial stages.
  • To address the conservativeness and low power of current qualitative interaction tests.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical calculations to assess test conservativeness.
  • Introduction of the 'minimum detectable effect' concept.
  • Proposal of a two-criterion method for identifying important heterogeneity: stage-specific effect below mean by minimum detectable effect, and statistically significant heterogeneity between stages.

Main Results:

  • Standard qualitative interaction tests are overly conservative in adaptive trial settings.
  • Published criteria for these tests exhibit very low power to detect interactions.
  • The proposed method offers a more sensitive approach to identifying crucial treatment heterogeneity.

Conclusions:

  • Existing qualitative interaction tests require re-evaluation for adaptive trial applications.
  • The 'minimum detectable effect' and proposed criteria provide a more robust method for detecting important treatment heterogeneity.
  • This approach can lead to more accurate and nuanced clinical utility decisions for drugs.