Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus by Ribosomal Spacer PCR (RS-PCR)
Published on: November 4, 2016
Heterogeneity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Italian pig finishing holdings
A Battisti1, A Franco, G Merialdi
1Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana, Rome, Italy. antonio.battisti@izslt.it
Abstract:
A survey for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in finishing pig holdings was carried out in Italy in 2008. MRSA isolates were characterised by spa-, MLST-, SCCmec- and antimicrobial susceptibility typing. A prevalence of 38% (45/118, 95% CI 29.4-46.9%) positive holdings was observed. Eleven different spa-types were found among 102 MRSA isolates, clustering in lineages associated with farm animals (ST398, ST9, ST(CC)97 in 36 holdings) and humans (ST1, 7 holdings). Nine (7.6%) holdings were positive for two, three or four different and unrelated spa-types in various combinations. ST398 was the most prevalent lineage (33 positive holdings). The most prevalent spa-type was t899 (ST398), detected in 22 positive holdings. Three novel spa-types (t4794 of ST9; t4795 of ST97; t4838 of ST398) were detected. Ten holdings were positive for spa-type t1730, that proved to be a new single-locus variant of ST97, within the CC97 (ST1476). The most prevalent SCCmec was Type V (79 isolates), while Type IVb was found in 10 isolates. None of the isolates was positive for Panton-Valentine Leukocidin, while most of the t127 and t1730 isolates, one t4794, one t4795, and one t2922 were positive for LukE-LukD genes. All 64 antimicrobial susceptibility tested isolates were resistant to tetracyclines, with high resistance rates to trimethoprim (68.8%), erythromycin (60.9%), and ciprofloxacin (35.4%). All t127, ST1 isolates were resistant to tetracycline-ciprofloxacin-erythromycin. This survey provides the first report of MRSA ST1 and ST(CC)97 among pigs and the first report of MRSA ST9 from pigs in Europe. The presence of human-associated CA-MRSA (t127, ST1, SCCmec type V) in 6% holdings surveyed can represent an additional MRSA reservoir for infections in humans.
Insights
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was found in 38% of Italian pig holdings in 2008. This study identified both animal- and human-associated MRSA strains, highlighting potential risks for human infections.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Public Health
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) poses a significant threat in both healthcare and agricultural settings.
- Understanding MRSA prevalence and strain diversity in livestock is crucial for controlling its spread and potential zoonotic transmission.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence and molecular characteristics of MRSA in Italian finishing pig holdings.
- To identify MRSA lineages, spa-types, SCCmec types, and antimicrobial resistance profiles.
- To assess the potential for MRSA transmission between pigs and humans.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide survey of MRSA in Italian finishing pig holdings conducted in 2008.
- Isolates were characterized using spa-typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), SCCmec typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
- Prevalence and genotypic data were analyzed to determine MRSA diversity and associations.
Main Results:
- MRSA was detected in 38% of the surveyed holdings (45/118).
- Eleven spa-types were identified, with lineages associated with farm animals (ST398, ST9, ST(CC)97) and humans (ST1) being prevalent.
- The study reported the first findings of MRSA ST1 and ST(CC)97 in pigs in Europe, along with ST9.
- High resistance rates were observed for tetracyclines, trimethoprim, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin.
Conclusions:
- The study confirms the presence of diverse MRSA strains, including those linked to human infections, in Italian pig populations.
- The findings suggest that pig holdings can act as reservoirs for MRSA, potentially posing a risk for human health.
- Further surveillance and control measures are warranted to mitigate MRSA transmission in agricultural settings.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA