Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids01:24

CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids

CNS stimulants, such as cocaine, amphetamines, and cannabinoids, have varying structures and mechanisms of action that lead to different therapeutic effects and side effects. Cocaine, with its molecular formula C17H21NO4, is a tropane alkaloid and a tertiary amino compound. It has two chemical forms: the hydrochloride salt and the "freebase." The former is in powder form, while the latter involves removing the hydrochloride salt to create a form that can be smoked. Cocaine exerts its effects by...
Stimulants01:29

Stimulants

Stimulants are substances that enhance neural activity and elevate dopamine levels in the brain, leading to their highly addictive nature. These drugs include cocaine, amphetamines, MDMA, caffeine, and nicotine, each with distinct mechanisms of action and varied health implications.
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Adrenergic Agonists: Mixed-Action Agents01:28

Adrenergic Agonists: Mixed-Action Agents

Mixed-action adrenergic agonists, like ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, directly and indirectly affect adrenergic receptors. These agents stimulate adrenoceptors and indirectly release stored neurotransmitters, amplifying the adrenergic response.
Ephedrine and pseudoephedrine lack a catecholamine group, making them less susceptible to degradation by metabolic enzymes. They have increased oral bioavailability and lipophilicity, resulting in a longer duration of action. Their response is reduced by...
Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents01:25

Adrenergic Agonists: Indirect-Acting Agents

Indirect-acting adrenergic agonists potentiate the effects of endogenous catecholamines through different mechanisms without directly binding to adrenoceptors.
One mechanism involves depleting stored catecholamines by displacing them from synaptic vesicles. These agents, known as "displacers," are transported into vesicles at the expense of noradrenaline. Examples include amphetamine and tyramine, which lack a catechol moiety, resulting in prolonged action, improved oral bioavailability, and...
CNS Stimulants: Psychedelic Agents01:22

CNS Stimulants: Psychedelic Agents

Hallucinogens, also known as psychedelic drugs, are a class of substances known for their ability to alter perception, cognition, and emotions. Despite their profound effects on the mind, these drugs are non-addictive, setting them apart from many other abused substances. The mechanism of action of these drugs lies in their impact on the 5-HT2A receptor in the brain. Upon activation, this receptor couples to Gq-type G proteins, triggering a cascade that releases intracellular calcium. This...
Hallucinogens and Psychedelics01:27

Hallucinogens and Psychedelics

Hallucinogens are psychoactive substances that profoundly alter perceptual experiences, generating unreal visual and sensory images. Often referred to as psychedelic drugs — a term derived from the Greek words "psyche" (mind) and "delos" (revealing) — these substances include marijuana and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), among others. These drugs vary in intensity and effects.
Marijuana, derived from the dried leaves and flowers of the hemp plant, contains delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The association between temperature and alcohol- and substance-related disorder hospital visits in New York State.

Communications medicine·2023
Same author

Methamphetamine, amphetamine, and aggression in humans: A systematic review of drug administration studies.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2022
Same author

Self-reported Subjective Effects of Analytically Confirmed New Psychoactive Substances Consumed by e-Psychonauts: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study Using a New Internet-Based Methodology.

JMIR research protocols·2021
Same author

Pathways to Drug Liberalization: Racial Justice, Public Health, and Human Rights.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2021
Same author

Response: Commentary: Totality of the Evidence Suggest Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Does Not Lead to Cognitive Impairments: A Systematic and Critical Review.

Frontiers in psychology·2021
Same author

Interlocutor accommodation of gradually altered nasal signal levels in a model speaker.

Phonetica·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
09:16

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration

Published on: January 22, 2016

Amphetamine analogs methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) differentially affect speech.

Gina F Marrone1, Jennifer S Pardo, Robert M Krauss

  • 1Division of Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr., Unit 120, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Psychopharmacology
|November 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Methamphetamine enhanced speech fluency and quantity, contrary to popular belief. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) impaired fluency and concentration, aligning with some anecdotal reports.

More Related Videos

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
12:09

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: June 14, 2014

Single Cell Measurement of Dopamine Release with Simultaneous Voltage-clamp and Amperometry
07:30

Single Cell Measurement of Dopamine Release with Simultaneous Voltage-clamp and Amperometry

Published on: November 21, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
09:16

A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration

Published on: January 22, 2016

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
12:09

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: June 14, 2014

Single Cell Measurement of Dopamine Release with Simultaneous Voltage-clamp and Amperometry
07:30

Single Cell Measurement of Dopamine Release with Simultaneous Voltage-clamp and Amperometry

Published on: November 21, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • Speech Science

Background:

  • Anecdotal reports on methamphetamine and MDMA's speech effects are common.
  • Scientific investigation into these effects is limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To objectively assess the impact of methamphetamine and MDMA on speech production.
  • To compare the effects of these stimulants in a controlled, within-participant design.

Main Methods:

  • Eleven recreational amphetamine users participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
  • Participants received methamphetamine (20, 40 mg), MDMA (100 mg), or placebo on separate occasions.
  • Speech samples (movie descriptions) and mood ratings were collected post-administration.

Main Results:

  • Methamphetamine increased speech quantity, fluency, and talkativeness, while reducing pause duration.
  • MDMA decreased speech fluency and increased self-reported concentration difficulties.
  • Undergraduates rated methamphetamine-influenced speech as more coherent than MDMA-influenced speech.

Conclusions:

  • Methamphetamine demonstrably improved verbal fluency, while MDMA impaired it.
  • These findings align with broader cognitive effects of these drugs.
  • Results partially support and contradict popular beliefs and anecdotal evidence regarding methamphetamine and MDMA's speech impacts.