Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

Prostate positioning errors associated with two automatic registration based image guidance strategies.

D Ryan, C Rivest1,2, Terence A Riauka3,2

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
|November 18, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Technical Note: Real-Time MLC Control and Latency Measurement Optimization with External Verification.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same author

Development of a Comprehensive Allergy Education Program for Primary Care Professionals: An EAACI Initiative.

Allergy·2026
Same author

EUFOREA summit in Brussels 2025: inspiring the future of allergy and respiratory care.

Frontiers in allergy·2026
Same author

Investigating the effect of synthetic nitrogen application rate on the milk production, intake, digestion, and nitrogen excretion of dairy cows fed perennial ryegrass or perennial ryegrass-white clover herbage.

Journal of dairy science·2026
Same author

Development and validation of a TOPAS Monte Carlo model for a 0.5 T bi-planar Linac-MR.

Medical physics·2026
Same author

Development of a Core Outcome Set for research studies with older adults in the Emergency Department-CREAT-ED: A multi-stage study protocol.

Trials·2026
Same journal

Synthetic CT-enabled weekly adaptive radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Optimizing plan adaptation triggers through volumetric-dosimetric monitoring.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Method for simultaneous selection of treatment isocenters and margins for polymetastatic extracranial stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Pulse‑level characterization of low monitor unit deliveries on a modern linear accelerator using a plastic scintillation detector.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Improving image quality in terbium-161 phantom imaging: Quantitative evaluation of DEW and TEW scatter correction methods.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Latent density discrepancies in commercial lung-equivalent inserts and their clinical dosimetric impact.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for patient-specific quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on anatomical structures.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Bone matching (BM) is more accurate than image matching (IM) for daily prostate positioning in helical tomotherapy. This study quantifies prostate misplacement, recommending BM for improved treatment accuracy and reduced toxicity.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Image Guidance

Background:

  • Accurate daily prostate positioning is crucial for helical tomotherapy efficacy and toxicity reduction.
  • Manual registration without fiducials can lead to inaccurate prostate localization.
  • Automatic registration methods require quantitative evaluation for clinical implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify prostate misplacement using automatic bone matching (BM) and image matching (IM) registration algorithms.
  • To compare the accuracy of BM and IM for daily image guidance in prostate tomotherapy.
  • To determine the optimal registration strategy for helical tomotherapy prostate patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 204 megavoltage CT (MVCT) images from 8 prostate cancer patients undergoing helical tomotherapy.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy
09:11

Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy

Published on: April 9, 2019

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
06:08

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound

Published on: March 21, 2025

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Multimodal Cross-Device and Marker-Free Co-Registration of Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

  • Independent registration of MVCT images to planning CT using BM and IM algorithms based on mutual information.
  • Automatic prostate localization using a correlation coefficient algorithm with planning CT contour information.
  • Calculation of daily 3D prostate positioning errors for both BM and IM algorithms.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean 3D prostate positioning errors were 3.7 +/- 2.1 mm for BM and 4.6 +/- 2.3 mm for IM.
    • Maximum 3D positioning errors were 11.8 mm for BM and 11.5 mm for IM.
    • Image matching (IM) resulted in positioning errors >= 3 mm in 62% of fractions, compared to 51% for bone matching (BM). Positioning errors >= 5 mm occurred in 29% of fractions for IM versus 17% for BM.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone matching (BM) demonstrates superior accuracy and reliability compared to image matching (IM) for daily prostate image guidance in helical tomotherapy.
    • Automatic daily image guidance for prostate tomotherapy should prioritize bone matching over image matching to minimize positioning errors.
    • Implementing bone matching can enhance treatment efficacy and reduce potential toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy.