Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026
06:18
A Bedside, Single Burr Hole Approach to Multimodality Monitoring in Severe Brain Injury
Published on: March 26, 2019
Chronic subdural hematoma--craniotomy versus burr hole trepanation
Yvonne Mondorf1, Muaath Abu-Owaimer, Michael R Gaab
1Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Nordstadt Hospital, Klinikum Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany.
British Journal of Neurosurgery
|November 20, 2009
Summary
For elderly patients with chronic subdural hematoma, burr hole evacuation is preferred over craniotomy due to lower recurrence rates. Craniectomy is reserved for complex, recurrent cases.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- Chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) is a common neurosurgical condition, particularly prevalent in the elderly population.
- Surgical intervention is the mainstay of treatment for symptomatic CSH.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze surgical outcomes for chronic subdural hematoma (CSH) with a focus on surgical techniques.
- To compare the efficacy and recurrence rates of different surgical approaches for CSH.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 193 patients undergoing surgical procedures for CSH between March 2003 and July 2008.
- Procedures included 151 craniotomies and 42 burr hole evacuations.
- Craniectomy was performed as a last resort in select cases.
Main Results:
- The overall recurrence rate requiring surgical revision was higher after craniotomy (27.8%) compared to burr hole evacuation (14.3%).
- Patients undergoing craniotomy had a significantly higher rate of revision surgery.
- Craniectomy was utilized in 3 cases of complicated recurrent CSH.
Conclusions:
- Burr hole evacuation is recommended as the preferred initial surgical treatment for chronic subdural hematoma due to a lower recurrence rate.
- Craniotomy may be associated with a higher risk of CSH recurrence.
- Craniectomy represents a viable option for managing complex and recurrent chronic subdural hematomas.
