Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Confirmation Biases

Confirmation Biases

The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?

The Representativeness Heuristic

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Juvenile Myositis: Insights on Classification, Pathogenesis and Therapies over the Past 50 Years.

Arthritis care & research·2026

Same author

A test of a conceptual model of uncertainty, benefit and burden in children and young people with juvenile dermatomyositis.

Rheumatology advances in practice·2026

Same author

Update on clinimetric assessments in juvenile dermatomyositis: conceptual foundations, current tools, and future directions : (Narrative review describing the development, validation, and application of clinimetric outcome measures in juvenile dermatomyositis).

Pediatric rheumatology online journal·2026

Same author

Factors associated with unplanned healthcare encounters in pediatric cancer patients.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026

Same author

A scoping review of digital psychosocial interventions for sleep disturbances in children with chronic health conditions.

Sleep medicine·2026

Same author

Systematic Literature Review Informing Paediatric Rheumatology European Society/Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance-Endorsed Recommendations for the Treat-to-Target Strategy in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

The Journal of rheumatology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

A valid and reliable belief elicitation method for Bayesian priors.

Sindhu R Johnson¹, George A Tomlinson, Gillian A Hawker

¹Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada. Sindhu.Johnson@uhn.on.ca

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|November 21, 2009

Summary

This study found a new method for eliciting expert beliefs for Bayesian priors is feasible, valid, and reliable. This approach can enhance Bayesian clinical studies by formally incorporating prior knowledge.

More Related Videos

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS)

Published on: June 3, 2009

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Clinical Trial Design
Medical Decision Making

Background:

Bayesian inference formally incorporates prior beliefs into treatment effect analyses using probability distributions (priors).
Various methods exist for eliciting expert beliefs for Bayesian studies, but their measurement properties are infrequently evaluated.
Evaluating the psychometric properties of belief elicitation methods is crucial for their reliable application in research.

Purpose of the Study:

To assess the feasibility, validity, and reliability of a novel belief elicitation method for generating Bayesian priors.
To determine if the method is practical for use in clinical research settings.
To establish the psychometric soundness of the elicitation technique.

Main Methods:

A single-center, cross-sectional study involving academic specialists treating pulmonary hypertension patients.
Participants used a novel method involving adhesive dots ('chips') in 'bins' on a line to express probabilities of 3-year survival with and without warfarin.
The study evaluated feasibility, face validity, construct validity, and test-retest reliability of the elicitation method.

Main Results:

The belief elicitation method was found to be feasible, with 92% of participants reporting face validity and 83% finding questions clear.
The response option was easy to use for 92% of participants, with a median completion time of 10 minutes.
Internal validity showed moderate agreement (weighted kappa=0.54-0.57), and test-retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.93).

Conclusions:

The developed method for belief elicitation for Bayesian priors demonstrates feasibility, validity, and reliability.
This method is suitable for application in Bayesian clinical studies, enhancing the incorporation of prior expert knowledge.
The findings support the use of this technique to improve the rigor of Bayesian analyses in medical research.