Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Evaluation of cellular phone technology with digital hearing aid features: effects of encoding and individualized
Carol L Mackersie1, Yingyong Qi, Arthur Boothroyd
1San Diego State University, School of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, 5500 Campanile Dr., MC-1518, San Diego, CA 92182-1518, USA. cmackers@mail.sdsu.edu
Purpose:
To compare multichannel amplification within a cellular phone system to a standard cellular phone response.
Research Design:
Three cellular phone speech-encoding strategies were evaluated: a narrow-band (3.5 kHz upper cutoff) enhanced variable-rate coder (EVRC), a narrow-band selectable mode vocoder (SMV), and a wide-band SMV (7.5 kHz cutoff). Because the SMV encoding strategies are not yet available on phones, the processing was simulated using a computer. Individualized-amplification settings were created using NAL-NL1 (National Acoustic Laboratories--Non-linear 1) targets. Overall gain was set at preferred listening levels for both the individualized-amplification setting and the standard cellular phone setting for each of the three encoders. Phoneme-recognition scores and subjective ratings (listening effort, overall quality) were obtained in quiet and in noise. Stimuli were played from loudspeakers in one room, picked up by a microphone connected to a (transmitting) computer, and sent over the Internet to a receiving computer in an adjacent room, where the signal was amplified and delivered monaurally.
Study Sample:
Fourteen participants with hearing loss.
Results:
Phoneme scores and subjective ratings were significantly higher for the individualized-amplification setting than for the standard setting in both quiet and noise. There were no significant differences among the cellular phone encoding strategies for any measure.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example
Hearing
