Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Early exposure to parent-perpetrated intimate partner violence predicts hypervigilant error monitoring.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2022

Same author

Unsupportive romantic partner behaviors increase neural reactivity to mistakes.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2021

Same author

Early parenting intervention accelerates inhibitory control development among CPS-involved children in middle childhood: A randomized clinical trial.

Developmental science·2020

Same author

Depressive symptoms and error-related brain activity in CPS-referred children.

Psychophysiology·2018

Same author

Electrophysiological indicators of inhibitory control deficits in depression.

Biological psychology·2017

Same author

The power of frontal midline theta and post-error slowing to predict performance recovery: Evidence for compensatory mechanisms.

Psychophysiology·2017

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

The way of our errors: theme and variations.

Robert F Simons¹

¹Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. rsimons@psych.udel.edu

Psychophysiology

|November 26, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Negative feedback guides learning and performance, involving brain regions like the anterior cingulate cortex. Event-related potentials reveal key neural signals for behavior adjustment.

More Related Videos

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Variations on Negative Stain Electron Microscopy Methods: Tools for Tackling Challenging Systems

Variations on Negative Stain Electron Microscopy Methods: Tools for Tackling Challenging Systems

Published on: February 6, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Variations on Negative Stain Electron Microscopy Methods: Tools for Tackling Challenging Systems

Variations on Negative Stain Electron Microscopy Methods: Tools for Tackling Challenging Systems

Published on: February 6, 2018

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology
Psychophysiology

Background:

Negative feedback is crucial for human learning and performance.
Executive functions, including performance monitoring and behavioral adjustment, are linked to the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal structures.
Neuroimaging studies consistently implicate these brain regions in feedback processing.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate neural processes underlying internal and external feedback using event-related potentials (ERPs).
To identify specific ERP components associated with feedback processing and behavioral adjustment.
To explore the clinical relevance of these findings.

Main Methods:

Employed event-related potentials (ERPs) to record brain activity.
Designed experiments to elicit responses to internal and external feedback.
Analyzed medial-frontal negativities, including error-related negativity, correct-response negativity, and feedback-related negativity.

Main Results:

Identified three distinct medial-frontal negativities (ERPs) related to feedback processing.
Demonstrated the roles of error-related negativity, correct-response negativity, and feedback-related negativity in monitoring and adjusting behavior.
Provided evidence for the functional significance of these ERPs in executive functions.

Conclusions:

Medial-frontal negativities are critical neural markers for performance monitoring and behavioral adaptation.
These ERP findings offer insights into the neural basis of learning from feedback.
The research has implications for understanding clinical conditions involving executive function deficits.