Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Perceived match or mismatch on the Gottman conflict styles: associations with relationship outcome variables
Dean M Busby1, Thomas B Holman
1School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. dean_busby@byu.edu
Abstract:
Gottman has proposed that there are 3 functional styles of conflict management in couple relationships, labeled Avoidant, Validating, and Volatile, and 1 dysfunctional style, labeled Hostile. Using a sample of 1,983 couples in a committed relationship, we test the association of perceived matches or mismatches on these conflict styles with relationship outcome variables. The results indicate that 32% of the participants perceive there is a mismatch with their conflict style and that of their partner. The Volatile-Avoidant mismatch was particularly problematic and was associated with more stonewalling, relationship problems, and lower levels of relationship satisfaction and stability than the Validating matched style and than other mismatched styles. The most problematic style was the Hostile style. Contrary to existing assumptions by Gottman, the 3 matched functional styles were not equivalent, as the Validating Style was associated with substantially better results on relationship outcome measures than the Volatile and Avoidant styles.
Related Concept Videos
Attachment Styles
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Hazan and Shaver's Attachment Styles
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
