Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

09:16
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
Published on: February 21, 2015
Chromosomal microarray interpretation: what is a child neurologist to do?
Alex R Paciorkowski1, Min Fang
1Division of Pediatric and Developmental Neurology, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8111, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. paciorkowskia@neuro.wustl.edu
Pediatric Neurology
|November 26, 2009
Summary
Chromosomal microarray analysis is crucial for diagnosing developmental disorders in children. This review provides guidance for interpreting complex results and understanding genotype-phenotype correlations.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Medical Genetics
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a key tool for evaluating pediatric neurologic developmental disorders.
- CMA is increasingly used for global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and autism spectrum disorders.
- Interpreting CMA results can be challenging for child neurologists.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a practical guide for child neurologists on interpreting CMA results.
- To present an algorithm for navigating various CMA testing scenarios.
- To propose a standardized system for ranking CMA data based on genotype-phenotype correlation evidence.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and clinical practices regarding CMA interpretation.
- Development of a decision-making algorithm for managing CMA results.
- Establishment of a tiered evidence-based system for genotype-phenotype correlation.
Main Results:
- CMA is central to diagnosing developmental disorders in children.
- A practical approach and algorithm are needed for interpreting complex CMA findings.
- Standardized ranking of array data enhances genotype-phenotype correlation understanding.
Conclusions:
- Child neurologists require practical guidance for interpreting complex CMA results.
- An algorithmic approach aids in managing diverse testing scenarios.
- A standardized system for ranking CMA data improves genotype-phenotype correlation assessment.
