Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for the Real-driving Emissions (RDE) Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
Are drivers' comparative risk judgments about speeding realistic?
Patricia Delhomme1, Jean-François Verlhiac, Cécile Martha
1INRETS, Laboratoire de Psychologie de la Conduite, 25 allée des Marronniers, Satory 78000 Versailles, France. patricia.delhomme@inrets.fr
Introduction:
This study focused on comparative judgments about speeding risks among young drivers who have a high risk of being involved in a traffic accident.
Method:
We examined (a) how these drivers assess their risk of sanctions and their risk of causing an automobile crash because of speeding in comparison to the estimated risks of other drivers, and (b) how realistic their comparative risk judgments are. We measured the relationship between the drivers' comparative risk judgments, self-reported speeding, and driving-related sensation-seeking. We hypothesized that (a) they would think they have less risk of sanctions and of causing a car accident than others, and (b) their comparative judgments of speeding risks would be linked to self-reported speeding and driving-related sensation-seeking. The study was based on a computerized questionnaire survey conducted with 3,002 young drivers (mean age=22.3) administered by professional investigators.
Results:
The results confirmed our hypotheses.
Impact On Industry:
In order to improve the effectiveness of prevention measures and to evaluate the effect of them, road-safety interventions should take into account comparative risk judgments about the targeted risk behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Introduction to Limits
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Determination of Expected Frequency

