Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

07:34
Enhancing Prostate Tumor Biobanking Reliability with Improved Sampling Technique and Histological Characterization
Published on: November 17, 2023
False-negative prostate needle biopsies: frequency, histopathologic features, and follow-up
Tineke Wolters1, Theodorus H van der Kwast, Cornelis J Vissers
1Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. t.wolters@erasmusmc.nl
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
|November 26, 2009
Summary
False-negative prostate biopsies, initially deemed benign but containing cancer or atypical small acinar proliferations (ASAP), occurred in 8.2% and 9.7% of cases, respectively. Awareness of variants and high-magnification review can improve accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Uropathology
- Prostate Cancer Screening
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- False-negative prostate biopsies, where initial benign findings conceal adenocarcinoma or atypical small acinar proliferations (ASAP), are not well understood.
- Evaluating these missed diagnoses is crucial for improving prostate cancer detection rates in screening programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the frequency, histopathologic features, and clinical implications of false-negative prostate biopsies within a prostate cancer screening context.
- To identify risk factors associated with missed prostate cancer diagnoses on initial biopsy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of prostate biopsy sets from 196 participants in a screening trial initially reported as benign.
- Two urologic pathologists re-examined biopsy cores, identifying adenocarcinoma and ASAP.
- Clinicopathologic data from initial and subsequent diagnoses were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Adenocarcinoma was found in 16 patients (8.2%) and ASAP in 19 patients (9.7%) upon re-examination.
- All missed cancers were Gleason score 6 (3+3).
- Estimated false-negative rates were 2.4% overall, 1.1% for cancer, and 1.3% for ASAP, with no significant clinical differences between false-negative and true benign cases.
Conclusions:
- Low gland counts, intermingling, and lack of disorganization were key risk factors for false-negative diagnoses.
- Prostate cancer variants (foamy gland, pseudohyperplastic) pose diagnostic challenges.
- Enhanced microscopic examination and awareness of variants can reduce missed prostate cancer diagnoses.
