Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Processing

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...

Neural Circuits

Neural Circuits

Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...

Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development

The formal operational stage, as described in Piaget's cognitive development theory, begins around age 11 and extends into adulthood. It marks the emergence of advanced cognitive abilities that differentiate adolescent and adult thinking from those of younger children. This stage is characterized by abstract reasoning, hypothetical-deductive reasoning, and a more complex understanding of self and others.
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Do Not Forget the Stimulus: A Missing Control in Naturalistic Studies of Neural Entrainment.

eNeuro·2026

Same author

Shared spatial and temporal principles govern connectome dynamics across timescales.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Neurophysiological mechanisms of optimized graphomotor performance in biscriptuals.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same author

Animal acoustic communication has a conserved optimal rhythm within the neural delta range.

PLoS biology·2026

Same author

Author Correction: Rapid modulation in music supports attention in listeners with attentional difficulties.

Communications biology·2026

Same author

Languages evolve ergodically: Clarifications and responses.

Physics of life reviews·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Three stages and four neural systems in time estimation.

Benjamin Morillon¹, Christian A Kell, Anne-Lise Giraud

¹Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, Inserm Unité 960, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France. bmorillon@ens.fr

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience

|November 27, 2009

Summary

This study validates a three-stage model of time estimation, revealing a duplicated collating process. Different brain regions track short and long durations, supporting unique counting and comparing systems.

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology

Background:

Existing theories of time estimation, such as Gibbon's scalar expectancy theory and Pöppel's dual system theory, propose different mechanisms for perceiving duration.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) offers a method to investigate the neurophysiological underpinnings of these theories.

Purpose of the Study:

To test the neurophysiological plausibility of Gibbon's three-stage model of time estimation.
To investigate the neural basis of duration perception, particularly the collating, counting, and comparing stages.
To reconcile findings with Pöppel's dual system theory.

Main Methods:

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to scan participants during a time estimation task.
Analysis focused on identifying brain regions involved in different stages of temporal processing.

Main Results:

The study validated a three-staged model of time estimation, supporting Gibbon's theory.
Evidence was found for a duplicated collating process: the motor system tracks durations under 2 seconds, while default mode network regions track longer durations.
Distinct brain regions were implicated in counting (prefrontal and parietal cortices) and comparing (temporal cortex) stages.

Conclusions:

The findings provide a coherent neuroanatomical framework for understanding time perception.
The results support a refined model of time estimation with distinct neural substrates for different temporal processing stages.
This research bridges theoretical models of time perception with empirical neuroimaging data.