Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they produce ions...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis00:59

Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis

Noncompartmental analyses offer an alternative method for describing drug pharmacokinetics without relying on a specific compartmental model. In this approach, the drug's pharmacokinetics are assumed to be linear, with the terminal phase log-linear. This assumption allows for simplified analysis and interpretation of the drug's behavior in the body.
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of force pain thresholds to ensure collision safety in worker-robot collaborative operations.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2024
Same author

A statistical model to predict the occurrence of blunt impact injuries on the human hand-arm system.

Journal of biomechanics·2023
Same author

A Statistical Model to Determine Biomechanical Limits for Physically Safe Interactions With Collaborative Robots.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2022
Same author

Impact of new operational dosimetric quantities on individual monitoring services.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same author

MEASUREMENT OF OPERATIONAL QUANTITIES Hp(0.07) AND Hp(3) FOR INDIGENOUSLY DEVELOPED 106Ru/106Rh SOURCE USING AN EXTRAPOLATION CHAMBER.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2019
Same author

BAYESIAN SPECTRUM DECONVOLUTION INCLUDING UNCERTAINTIES AND MODEL SELECTION: APPLICATION TO X-RAY EMISSION DATA USING WINBUGS.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Uncertainties in external dosimetry: analytical vs. Monte Carlo method.

R Behrens1

  • 1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, Braunschweig 38116, Germany. Rolf.Behrens@PTB.de

Radiation Protection Dosimetry
|November 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary

The analytical method often overestimates dosemeter uncertainty, failing to meet International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations. The Monte Carlo method provides a more realistic uncertainty evaluation, aligning with ICRP guidelines for occupational dosimetry.

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification (ADCI) and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Protection
  • Metrology

Background:

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) provides recommendations for occupational dosimetry uncertainty.
  • The trumpet curves are widely accepted practical recommendations for assessing dosimetry uncertainty.
  • International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Technical Report provides methods for assessing dosemeter uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare the analytical and Monte Carlo methods for assessing dosemeter uncertainty.
  • To evaluate compliance with ICRP uncertainty recommendations using different assessment methods.
  • To determine the accuracy and reliability of analytical versus Monte Carlo methods in occupational dosimetry.

Main Methods:

  • Direct comparison of analytical and Monte Carlo methods for uncertainty assessment.
  • Application of both methods using identical input data for occupational dosemeters.
  • Evaluation of dosemeter compliance with ICRP trumpet curve recommendations.

Main Results:

  • The analytical method generally overestimates uncertainty by 10-30%.
  • Overestimated uncertainty often leads to non-compliance with ICRP recommendations.
  • Monte Carlo method provides more realistic uncertainty evaluations, typically complying with ICRP recommendations.

Conclusions:

  • The Monte Carlo method is superior to the analytical method for realistic uncertainty evaluation in occupational dosimetry.
  • Routine dosemeters assessed with the analytical method may incorrectly appear non-compliant with ICRP standards.
  • Monte Carlo simulations offer a more reliable approach to ensure compliance with radiation protection guidelines.