Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Chinese Herbal Retention Enema for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis
Published on: May 16, 2025
Rectal fecal impaction treatment in childhood constipation: enemas versus high doses oral PEG
Noor-L-Houda Bekkali1, Maartje-Maria van den Berg, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
1Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands. n.bekkali@amc.nl
Insights
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) and enemas are equally effective for treating rectal fecal impaction in children. PEG resulted in more fecal incontinence, but both treatments showed similar improvements in colonic transit time.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Colorectal Disorders
- Pharmacological Treatments
Background:
- Rectal fecal impaction (RFI) is a common issue in children with functional constipation.
- Current treatment options include enemas and osmotic laxatives like polyethylene glycol (PEG).
- The comparative efficacy and tolerability of these treatments for RFI require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of enemas versus PEG in treating RFI in children.
- To assess the impact of these treatments on colonic transit time (CTT) and patient behavior.
- To evaluate the tolerability and side effect profiles of enemas and PEG for RFI.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving children aged 4-16 with functional constipation and RFI.
- Patients received either daily enemas or PEG (1.5 g/kg/day) for six days.
- Assessments included successful disimpaction, defecation and incontinence frequencies, abdominal pain, watery stools, CTT measurements, and behavior questionnaires.
Main Results:
- Both enemas (80%) and PEG (68%) achieved successful rectal disimpaction, with no statistically significant difference (P = .28).
- PEG was associated with increased fecal incontinence and watery stools (P < .01) compared to enemas.
- Defecation frequency, abdominal pain, and behavior scores were comparable between groups, and CTT normalized equally in both groups (P = .85).
Conclusions:
- Enemas and PEG demonstrate equivalent efficacy in resolving rectal fecal impaction in pediatric patients.
- PEG may lead to a higher incidence of fecal incontinence, while other outcomes and tolerability are similar.
- Both enemas and PEG are suitable as first-line therapies for pediatric RFI.
Objective:
We hypothesized that enemas and polyethylene glycol (PEG) would be equally effective in treating rectal fecal impaction (RFI) but enemas would be less well tolerated and colonic transit time (CTT) would improve during disimpaction.
Methods:
Children (4-16 years) with functional constipation and RFI participated. One week before disimpaction, a rectal examination was performed, symptoms of constipation were recorded, and the first CTT measurement was started. If RFI was determined, then patients were assigned randomly to receive enemas once daily or PEG (1.5 g/kg per day) for 6 consecutive days. During this period, the second CTT measurement was started and a child's behavior questionnaire was administered. Successful rectal disimpaction, defecation and fecal incontinence frequencies, occurrence of abdominal pain and watery stools, CTTs (before and after disimpaction), and behavior scores were assessed.
Results:
Ninety-five patients were eligible, of whom 90 participated (male, n = 60; mean age: 7.5 +/- 2.8 years). Forty-six patients received enemas and 44 PEG, with 5 dropouts in each group. Successful disimpaction was achieved with enemas (80%) and PEG (68%; P = .28). Fecal incontinence and watery stools were reported more frequently with PEG (P < .01), but defecation frequency (P = .64), abdominal pain (P = .33), and behavior scores were comparable between groups. CTT normalized equally (P = .85) in the 2 groups.
Conclusion:
Enemas and PEG were equally effective in treating RFI in children. Compared with enemas, PEG caused more fecal incontinence, with comparable behavior scores. The treatments should be considered equally as first-line therapy for RFI.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Other Laxatives
Osmotic or saline laxatives, like magnesium hydroxide or milk of...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Bulk-Forming and Stimulant Laxatives
Bulk-forming laxatives, such as psyllium, methylcellulose, and polycarbophil, absorb water in the intestine, increasing stool bulk and promoting bowel movement. This makes...
Drugs for Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant IBS
Two specific drugs used in the treatment are alosetron (Lotronex) and eluxadoline (Viberzi). Alosetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, works by slowing the movement of stools in the gut, reducing bowel...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Adsorbents as Antidiarrheal Agents
Adsorbents...
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Opioids as Antidiarrheal Agents
Opioids, widely used antidiarrheal agents, mitigate diarrhea by slowing down...
