Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026
09:12
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
Published on: July 4, 2013
Balancing risks and rewards: the logic of violence
1Department of Mathematics, University of Sussex Brighton, UK. m.broom@sussex.ac.uk
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|December 2, 2009
Summary
This study examines violence within social animal groups, like dominance hierarchies and infanticide. Evolutionary game theory explains these seemingly paradoxical behaviors as logical for individuals, despite group costs.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Animal Behavior
Background:
- Violence is common in nature, including predation and competition.
- Intragroup violence, within cooperating social groups, is less understood.
- Examples include dominance hierarchies and infanticide.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the evolutionary logic behind violence within social animal groups.
- To analyze intragroup violence using evolutionary game theory.
- To explore the broader context of interspecific violence.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of existing literature on animal violence.
- Application of evolutionary game theory principles.
- Comparative study of different species exhibiting intragroup violence.
Main Results:
- Intragroup violence, though costly to the group, can be evolutionarily advantageous for individuals.
- Dominance hierarchies and infanticide are explained as logical individual strategies.
- The study provides a framework for understanding seemingly paradoxical violent behaviors.
Conclusions:
- Violence within social groups serves individual evolutionary interests.
- Evolutionary game theory offers valuable insights into animal conflict.
- Understanding intragroup violence is crucial for comprehending social dynamics in nature.
Related Concept Videos
01:47Aggression
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
03:26Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
01:26Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma: