Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation01:20

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.
Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Type I interferon primes the alveolar epithelium to receive reparative signals from tissue-resident macrophages.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Reirradiation for Patients With Recurrent Ependymoma Across the Age Spectrum.

Advances in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Understanding and overcoming innate and acquired MAPK inhibition resistance in anaplastic thyroid cancer.

Cell reports. Medicine·2026
Same author

Local IFNγ signaling contributes to the regenerative decline of aged alveolar progenitor cells.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Impact of the Exposome on Epithelial Barriers: New Approach Methodologies for Translational Research.

Thoracic research and practice·2026
Same author

Standardized pipeline for establishing, expanding, and differentiating airway and alveolar organoids from human BAL fluid.

American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
10:20

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Separating stem cells by flow cytometry: reducing variability for solid tissues.

Caroline M Alexander1, Joel Puchalski, Kristine S Klos

  • 1McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Madison, WI 53706, USA. alexander@oncology.wisc.edu

Cell Stem Cell
|December 3, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Flow cytometry is used to identify stem cells, but inconsistent reporting hinders research. Clear guidelines are needed to improve the reproducibility of stem cell analysis in solid tissues.

More Related Videos

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations
09:34

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

In Vivo Osteo-organoid Approach for Harvesting Therapeutic Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
05:32

In Vivo Osteo-organoid Approach for Harvesting Therapeutic Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells

Published on: February 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells
10:20

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations
09:34

A Combinatorial Single-cell Approach to Characterize the Molecular and Immunophenotypic Heterogeneity of Human Stem and Progenitor Populations

Published on: October 25, 2018

In Vivo Osteo-organoid Approach for Harvesting Therapeutic Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
05:32

In Vivo Osteo-organoid Approach for Harvesting Therapeutic Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells

Published on: February 16, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research
  • Cell biology
  • Stem cell science

Background:

  • Accurate identification of stem cells in vivo remains a challenge without specific molecular markers.
  • Flow cytometry is currently used to isolate stem cell populations based on functional characteristics.
  • Inconsistent data reporting in flow cytometry studies complicates the comparison of results across different research groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the challenges in stem cell research due to inconsistent flow cytometry data reporting.
  • To advocate for standardized reporting guidelines to enhance the reproducibility of stem cell analyses.
  • To emphasize the need for better methods for visualizing stem cells in vivo.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices in flow cytometric analysis for stem cell research.
  • Analysis of data reporting inconsistencies in published literature.
  • Discussion of the impact of these inconsistencies on research reproducibility.

Main Results:

  • Flow cytometry data reporting styles are highly variable, leading to difficulties in cross-publication comparisons.
  • Lack of standardized reporting impacts the ability to validate and replicate stem cell findings.
  • Current methods for stem cell enrichment lack universal identifiers for in vivo visualization.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized reporting guidelines for flow cytometry are essential for improving the reproducibility of stem cell research.
  • Clearer guidelines will facilitate more reliable comparisons of stem cell data across studies.
  • Development of in vivo visualization tools for stem cells is a future research direction.