Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development

The sensorimotor stage, the initial phase of Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development, spans the first two years of a child's life. During this period, infants actively engage with their surroundings, building cognitive awareness through direct interaction with the world. This interaction is primarily based on sensory perception and motor actions, allowing infants to gradually understand basic physical properties and predict how objects interact within their environment.
Exploration...

The Nativist Approach

The Nativist Approach

The nativist approach to infant cognitive development proposes that infants are born with inherent knowledge structures that allow them to interpret the world almost immediately. This perspective contrasts with earlier developmental theories, such as those proposed by Jean Piaget, which emphasized a more gradual acquisition of cognitive abilities through interaction with the environment. One key concept in this approach is object permanence — the understanding that objects continue to exist...

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development

The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development

During Piaget's concrete operational stage, from ages 7 to 11, children exhibit a marked increase in logical thinking skills, specifically in relation to tangible, real-world events. This stage is characterized by the development of several essential cognitive concepts, including conservation, reversibility, and classification, all of which support the child's evolving capacity for structured thought.
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the concrete...

Observational Learning

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...

Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development

Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development

The formal operational stage, as described in Piaget's cognitive development theory, begins around age 11 and extends into adulthood. It marks the emergence of advanced cognitive abilities that differentiate adolescent and adult thinking from those of younger children. This stage is characterized by abstract reasoning, hypothetical-deductive reasoning, and a more complex understanding of self and others.
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Trust and Cooperation.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2022

Same author

Learning and Acting in Peripersonal Space: Moving, Reaching, and Grasping.

Frontiers in neurorobotics·2019

Same author

Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents.

Nature·2018

Same author

Building machines that learn and think for themselves.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2018

Same author

A Bayesian generative model for learning semantic hierarchies.

Frontiers in psychology·2014

Same author

Drinking from the firehose of experience.

Artificial intelligence in medicine·2008

Same journal

Area-Coverage Planning for Spray-based Surface Disinfection with a Mobile Manipulator.

Robotics and autonomous systems·2022

Same journal

UV Disinfection Robots: A Review.

Robotics and autonomous systems·2022

Same journal

An analysis of international use of robots for COVID-19.

Robotics and autonomous systems·2021

Same journal

A collaborative robot for COVID-19 oropharyngeal swabbing.

Robotics and autonomous systems·2021

Same journal

Occupant-centric robotic air filtration and planning for classrooms for Safer school reopening amid respiratory pandemics.

Robotics and autonomous systems·2021

Same journal

Robotics and artificial intelligence in healthcare during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

Robotics and autonomous systems·2021

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

The Initial Development of Object Knowledge by a Learning Robot.

Joseph Modayil¹, Benjamin Kuipers

¹Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester PO Box 270226, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.

Robotics and Autonomous Systems

|December 3, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Robots can learn about objects using unsupervised sensorimotor experience, developing integrated knowledge for recognition and task completion. This intrinsic learning enables robots to plan and control actions for achieving goals.

More Related Videos

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum

Published on: February 12, 2017

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

The Modular Design and Production of an Intelligent Robot Based on a Closed-Loop Control Strategy

Published on: October 14, 2017

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

Area of Science:

Robotics
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning

Background:

Robots traditionally require explicit programming or large labeled datasets to understand objects.
Developing intrinsic, unsupervised learning capabilities is crucial for adaptable and autonomous robots.

Purpose of the Study:

To present a method for robots to acquire object knowledge directly from sensorimotor experience without supervision.
To demonstrate the utility of intrinsically acquired knowledge for downstream tasks.

Main Methods:

Developing integrated representations: spatio-temporal trackers, object percepts, generalization classes, and action models.
Utilizing unsupervised sensorimotor data for knowledge acquisition.
Evaluating the acquired knowledge on object recognition and goal-oriented tasks.

Main Results:

The robot successfully developed integrated object knowledge representations.
The acquired knowledge proved effective for object recognition.
The system demonstrated capabilities in planning and continuous control for task achievement.

Conclusions:

Unsupervised sensorimotor experience is a viable pathway for robots to build foundational object knowledge.
Intrinsically learned object representations support both recognition and complex task execution.