Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Determination of prevalence and risk factors of childhood malnutrition in Ilorin South, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Analysis and evaluation of educational supervision practices in Gambian schools.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Validating an evaluation checklist using a mixed method design.

Wes Martz1

  • 1Kadant Inc., Portage, MI 49081, USA. martz@EvaluativeOrganization.com

Evaluation and Program Planning
|December 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a feasible mixed-methods approach for validating evaluation checklists. The presented methods offer a quick and budget-friendly way to ensure the reliability of these essential evaluation tools.

Area of Science:

  • Evaluation Science
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Checklists are widely accepted tools for systematic evidence collection in evaluations.
  • The validation methods for evaluation checklists are often not well-defined or lack specific study designs.
  • This gap hinders the rigorous assessment of checklist reliability and validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the deficit in validated evaluation checklist methodologies.
  • To present a case example of a mixed-methods validation study for an evaluation checklist.
  • To demonstrate a validation approach that is quick, feasible, and budget-friendly.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods validation study was designed and applied to a specific evaluation checklist.
  • The study involved two distinct validation parts, detailed within the article.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

  • The approach was designed for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

    • Main Results:

    • The presented mixed-methods validation approach was demonstrated to be feasible.
    • The methodology proved to be relatively quick and suitable for limited budgets.
    • The study provided a reasonable level of validation for the evaluation checklist.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed validation approach offers a practical solution for ensuring the quality of evaluation checklists.
    • This methodology enhances the rigor of evaluation practices by providing a validated tool.
    • Further discussion on the limitations of the presented validation methodology is included.