Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
Theoretical comparisons of nerve and muscle activation by neuromuscular incapacitation devices
1U.A. Whitaker School of Engineering, Florida Gulf Coast University, FL 33965-6565, USA. jsweeney@fgcu.edu
Abstract:
In this study important aspects of the TASER(R) M26 and X26 neuromuscular incapacitation device waveforms are simulated, analyzed and contrasted against electrical stimulation with rectangular waveforms (commonly used in therapeutic stimulation devices). Expected skeletal muscle forces evoked by M26 and X26 stimulation are simulated also and compared against forces expected with higher or lower frequency trains. The first half-cycle of the M26 damped 50 kHz sinusoidal wave is the main contributor to stimulation threshold with this device. The pseudo-monophasic component of the X26 waveform primarily determines threshold for this system, with the leading damped 100 kHz component contributing little in this regard. Simulated isometric forces evoked at 19 Hz with either device are moderately intense (about 46% of maximal). Lower frequencies would likely not provide sufficient levels of contraction to override volitional motor control.
Related Concept Videos
Neuromuscular Junction And Blockade
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...

