Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

07:45
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
Binocular fixation disparity in single word displays.
Kevin B Paterson1, Timothy R Jordan, Stoyan Kurtev
1School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester LE19HN, UK. kbp3@le.ac.uk
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|December 9, 2009
Summary
Word recognition is not affected by where your eyes land on a word. Despite inaccurate and misaligned eye fixations during reading, word recognition remains consistent, challenging previous assumptions.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Previous research suggests word recognition is sensitive to fixation location.
- However, this is challenged by findings of misaligned binocular fixations during reading.
- The impact of fixation accuracy and alignment on single-word recognition remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the accuracy and alignment of binocular fixations during single-word processing.
- To determine if fixation location or disparity affects word recognition.
- To reconcile fixation location effects with binocular fixation misalignment.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a lexical decision task with words presented at various locations.
- Eye-tracking data was collected to analyze fixation accuracy and alignment.
- The relationship between fixation characteristics and word recognition accuracy was examined.
Main Results:
- Eye-tracking revealed frequent inaccurate and misaligned binocular fixations.
- Despite these fixation errors, word recognition performance was not significantly affected.
- Binocular fixation disparity was observed even in isolated single-word displays.
Conclusions:
- Binocular fixation disparity is common during single-word recognition.
- Fixation location and disparity do not appear to influence word recognition accuracy.
- These findings highlight a potential confound in studies investigating fixation location effects on reading.
