Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation

Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group effort.

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Permission Paradox: Condoning Deception Can Promote Honesty in Young Children.

Developmental science·2026

Same author

Negative descriptive norms can influence young children's generosity even when positive descriptive norms do not.

Child development·2026

Same author

Reciprocity norms can promote dishonesty in children.

Child development·2026

Same author

Hiding discrimination in plain sight: The development of reasoning about disparate impact policies.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Same author

Overheard evaluative comments can affect young children's effort.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Same author

Reasoning about the merits of meritocracy.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

Children's reasoning about evaluative feedback.

Gail D Heyman¹, Genyue Fu, Monica A Sweet

¹Department of Psychology, University of California, 9500 Gilmon Drive, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92093-0109, USA. gheyman@ucsd.edu

The British Journal of Developmental Psychology

|December 10, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Children expect peers to give more positive than negative feedback, especially younger children. Cultural differences in reasoning about feedback implications were observed between US and Chinese children.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure

Published on: September 19, 2019

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Area of Science:

Developmental Psychology
Social Psychology
Cross-Cultural Psychology

Background:

Understanding children's social cognition is crucial for developmental psychology.
Peer feedback plays a significant role in children's social and academic development.
Cross-cultural comparisons illuminate universal and culturally specific aspects of social reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how children aged 6–11 reason about peers' willingness to provide positive versus negative performance feedback.
To examine cross-cultural differences (USA vs. China) in children's expectations of peer feedback.
To explore the influence of child age and relationship dynamics on feedback predictions.

Main Methods:

A total of 179 children (6–11 years old) from the USA and China participated.
Participants responded to scenarios assessing their predictions of peer feedback.
Open-ended questions explored the reasoning behind their feedback expectations.

Main Results:

Children in both countries anticipated peers would be more likely to give positive feedback than negative feedback.
This positivity bias was more pronounced in younger children across cultures.
Chinese children, particularly older ones, considered future performance implications and potential negative effects of positive feedback (e.g., pride).

Conclusions:

Children exhibit an age-related bias towards expecting positive peer feedback.
Cross-cultural factors influence children's nuanced understanding of feedback's social and performance consequences.
Future research should further explore cultural variations in prosocial communication and social judgment.