Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Binary methods for continuous outcomes: a parametric alternative.

S Suissa1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pioglitazone and bladder cancer: improving research methods.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2020
Same author

A systematic review of observational studies of the association between pioglitazone use and bladder cancer.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2018
Same author

Drospirenone-containing oral contraceptive pills and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of observational studies.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2017
Same author

Cardiotoxicity of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2016
Same author

Drospirenone-containing combined oral contraceptives and the risk of arterial thrombosis: a population-based nested case-control study.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2016
Same author

Concern on quality-of-life analysis in the OPTIMAL study.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2013
Same journal

Harms Reporting Was Frequently Incomplete or Discordant in Biomedical Randomized Trials Published in 2023: A Meta-epidemiological Study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Using an Open Science Checklist in Grant Proposal Reviews to Predict Reproducibility of Funded Publications.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a novel statistical method for estimating disease risk without dichotomizing continuous data. The proposed Gaussian distribution-based approach is more efficient and accurate than traditional binary methods, especially for small sample sizes.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Disease states are often defined by thresholds on continuous variables (e.g., hypertension).
  • Traditional risk estimation involves dichotomizing data, leading to potential inefficiency.
  • This approach relies on methods developed for binary data, typically binomial distributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a statistical method for estimating disease risk that avoids dichotomization.
  • To assume a Gaussian (normal) distribution for continuous outcome variables.
  • To provide accurate risk and variance estimation for one- and two-sample scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a method assuming a Gaussian distribution for continuous outcomes.
  • Applied the method to estimate risk and variance in one- and two-sample situations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated risk differences, risk ratios, and odds ratios for two-sample comparisons.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method is significantly more efficient (up to 67%) than the binomial approach on dichotomized data.
    • The method demonstrates high accuracy, even with small sample sizes.
    • Sensitivity analysis indicates potential issues with non-Gaussian, heavy-tailed distributions.

    Conclusions:

    • Avoiding dichotomization offers a more efficient and accurate way to estimate disease risk from continuous data.
    • The Gaussian-based method is robust for various sample sizes but requires careful consideration of underlying data distribution.
    • Illustrative examples include total cholesterol, arterial oxygenation, and lupus nephritic patient data.