The endoscopic U-stitch technique for primary button placement: an institution's experience
Neil Nixdorff1, Jennifer Diluciano, Todd Ponsky
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Surgical Endoscopy
|December 10, 2009
Summary
The endoscopic U-stitch technique safely places gastrostomy buttons in 95% of pediatric patients, with a low complication rate comparable to other methods.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Gastroenterology
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Gastrostomy tube placement is crucial for nutritional support in pediatric patients.
- Various techniques exist, but the endoscopic U-stitch offers primary button placement without laparoscopy.
- Evaluating the efficacy and safety of this specific technique is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the success rate of primary gastrostomy button placement using the endoscopic U-stitch technique.
- To determine the incidence of complications associated with the endoscopic U-stitch gastrostomy.
- To compare the outcomes of the endoscopic U-stitch technique with other established methods.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of all gastrostomy procedures performed between February 2001 and September 2008.
- Data extraction from both paper and electronic medical records for endoscopic U-stitch procedures.
- Analysis of completion rates, operative times, and postoperative complications.
Main Results:
- The endoscopic U-stitch technique achieved primary button placement in 115 out of 121 patients (95%).
- Six cases (5%) required conversion to an open procedure.
- A low complication rate of 7% was observed, with no procedure-related deaths. Complications included hematemesis, cellulitis, colonic perforation, granulation tissue, and fistula closure. Average operative time was 18 minutes.
Conclusions:
- The endoscopic U-stitch technique is a safe and effective method for primary gastrostomy button placement in pediatric patients.
- Its complication profile is favorable when compared to laparoscopic and open gastrostomy techniques.
- This minimally invasive approach offers a viable alternative for gastrostomy tube insertion.

