Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants
Published on: December 14, 2014
Questioning the methodologic superiority of 'placebo' over 'active' controlled trials
1University of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Old Road Campus, Oxford, United Kingdom. jeremy.howick@dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Placebo-controlled trials (PCTs) may be unethical when effective treatments exist. This analysis argues that active-controlled trials (ACTs) are not methodologically inferior, resolving ethical conflicts in clinical research.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research Ethics
- Methodology
Background:
- Ethical dilemmas arise when placebo-controlled trials (PCTs) withhold effective treatments from participants.
- Clinicians' duty to provide best care suggests using active-controlled trials (ACTs) when established treatments are available.
- Methodological concerns regarding ACTs often favor PCTs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and refute the purported methodological inferiority of ACTs compared to PCTs.
- To resolve the ethical tension between providing optimal patient care and employing rigorous research methods.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of three key arguments claiming ACTs are inferior to PCTs:
- Examination of 'assay sensitivity' in ACTs.
- Evaluation of absolute effect size measurement in ACTs.
- Assessment of participant number requirements for ACTs.
Main Results:
- The three primary arguments for ACTs' methodological inferiority are found to be unacceptable.
- ACTs are not inherently inferior to PCTs in terms of assay sensitivity, effect size measurement, or participant numbers.
- The methodological objections to ACTs do not hold up under scrutiny.
Conclusions:
- The ethical imperative to avoid placebo-controlled trials (PCTs) when effective treatments exist is supported by methodological considerations.
- The perceived methodological disadvantages of active-controlled trials (ACTs) are not valid.
- The ethical conflict between clinical and research ethics regarding trial design is resolved in favor of avoiding PCTs.
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
The Placebo Effect
Blind Procedures
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
