Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone stimulators for fusions and fractures.

R M Barden1, G L Sinkora

  • 1Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, Chicago, Illinois 60612.

The Nursing Clinics of North America
|March 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2001
Same author

Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2001
Same author

Long-term followup of the Miller-Galante total knee replacement.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2001
Same author

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·1999
Same author

Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·1998
Same author

Results of different surgical procedures on total knee arthroplasty infections.

The Journal of arthroplasty·1996
Same journal

Expecting the Unexpected.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Nursing at the Center of Emergencies.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

A Scoping Review on Managing Mental Health Emergencies in Elderly Population in WHO Regions.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Support Strategies and Policy Recommendations to Manage the Aftermath of an Emergency or Traumatic Situation.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Navigating Extreme Weather Events: Experiences of Nursing Leaders in a Rural, Acute Care Hospital in Atlantic Canada.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Ensuring Patient-Centered Care During an Emergency in Resource-Constrained Primary Health Care Settings.

The Nursing clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Understanding electrical responses in bone is incomplete, but gathered data has improved patient care through electrophysiologic devices. Further research is essential to address skepticism regarding electrical stimulation for bone healing.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Orthopedics
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Electrical responses of bone are not fully understood.
  • Existing knowledge has led to devices impacting patient care.
  • Skepticism exists among healthcare professionals regarding electrical stimulation for bone healing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current understanding of bone electrophysiology.
  • To highlight the impact of electrophysiologic devices on patient care.
  • To emphasize the need for further research in electrical stimulation for bone healing.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of electrophysiological studies on bone.
  • Analysis of clinical applications of bone electrophysiology.
  • Identification of research gaps and clinical skepticism.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Useful data on bone's electrical responses have been gathered.
  • Devices utilizing electrophysiologic properties have positively impacted patient care.
  • Significant skepticism persists regarding electrical stimulation's efficacy in bone healing.

Conclusions:

  • While progress has been made, a complete understanding of bone's electrical responses is still lacking.
  • Electrophysiologic devices have demonstrated clinical utility.
  • Further research is crucial to validate electrical stimulation for bone healing and inform clinical practice.