Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for the concentration and simultaneous recovery of multiple pathogens in contaminated

Hee-Yeon Kim1, Hyeun-Jin Park, Gwangpyo Ko

  • 1Department of Environmental Health and Institute of Health and Environment, School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Journal of Food Protection
|December 17, 2009
PubMed

Insights

Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration (HUF) effectively recovers diverse foodborne pathogens. Adding beef extract blocking buffer significantly boosts recovery rates for viruses and bacterial spores.

Area of Science:

  • Food safety microbiology
  • Water and foodborne pathogen detection
  • Filtration and concentration techniques

Background:

  • Accurate detection of foodborne pathogens is crucial for public health.
  • Traditional methods often require extensive sample processing for pathogen recovery.
  • Simultaneous recovery of diverse microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, spores) presents a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate hollow-fiber ultrafiltration (HUF) for simultaneous recovery of multiple foodborne microorganisms.
  • To assess the impact of different elution buffers and blocking agents on recovery efficiency.
  • To determine HUF's effectiveness in concentrating pathogens from various food matrices.

Main Methods:

  • Inoculation of MS2 bacteriophage, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis spores, and murine norovirus (MNV) into distilled water or elution buffers.
  • Concentration of microorganisms using hollow-fiber polysulfone ultrafilters.
  • Analysis of concentrates via cultivation and TaqMan real-time reverse transcription PCR.
  • Testing the effect of beef extract blocking buffer on recovery rates.
  • Application of HUF for pathogen recovery from lettuce and ham samples.

Main Results:

  • Average recovery rates were 7.1% in distilled water and 17.1% in glycine elution buffer.
  • Simultaneous recovery of virus, bacteria, and spores averaged 16.8% without blocking buffer.
  • Addition of 3% beef extract blocking buffer increased overall recovery to 46.1%.
  • Significant increases in recovery rates for B. subtilis spores and MNV were observed with blocking buffer.
  • HUF achieved E. coli recovery rates of ~67% on lettuce and ham, and MNV recovery rates of ~3.6% on these foods.

Conclusions:

  • Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration is a viable method for simultaneous recovery of diverse bacterial and viral pathogens from food samples.
  • Optimizing elution buffers and using blocking agents like beef extract can substantially improve HUF efficiency.
  • HUF offers a promising approach for concentrating pathogens, aiding in sensitive detection for food safety.