Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Using Bioluminescent Imaging to Investigate Synergism Between Streptococcus pneumoniae and Influenza A Virus in Infant Mice
Published on: April 14, 2011
Influenza vaccine concurrently administered with a combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to young children
Lucy Chai See Lum1, Charissa Fay Borja-Tabora, Robert F Breiman
1Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Insights
Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) given with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (Priorix) showed lower rubella response rates in children. However, LAIV maintained its effectiveness in preventing influenza.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Vaccinology
- Immunology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is an alternative to inactivated influenza vaccines.
- Combined vaccines are often administered to children to improve vaccination coverage.
- Assessing vaccine-school interactions is crucial for understanding immune responses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the immunogenicity of LAIV when co-administered with the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine (Priorix) in children.
- To determine if concomitant administration affects the efficacy of either vaccine.
- To assess seroresponse rates for measles, mumps, and rubella.
Main Methods:
- Children aged 11 to 24 months received two doses of intranasal LAIV or placebo, 35 days apart.
- The first dose of LAIV was given concurrently with Priorix.
- Seroresponse rates were measured using specified antibody thresholds (15 IU/mL and 10 IU/mL for rubella).
Main Results:
- Seroresponses to measles and mumps were comparable between the LAIV+Priorix and placebo groups.
- Rubella response rates were statistically lower in the LAIV+Priorix group at a 15 IU/mL threshold, failing to meet noninferiority criteria.
- At a 10 IU/mL threshold, noninferiority for rubella response was met.
- Concomitant administration did not impact the overall influenza protection rate of LAIV.
Conclusions:
- Co-administration of LAIV with Priorix may impact rubella immunogenicity, although this effect is threshold-dependent.
- LAIV retains its protective efficacy against influenza when given alongside the MMR vaccine.
- Further research may be needed to fully understand the implications of combined vaccine administration on specific immune responses.
Abstract:
Children aged 11 to <24 months received 2 intranasal doses of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) or placebo, 35+/-7 days apart. Dose 1 was administered concomitantly with a combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (Priorix). Seroresponses to measles and mumps were similar between groups. Compared with placebo, response rates to rubella in LAIV+Priorix recipients were statistically lower at a 15 IU/mL threshold (83.9% vs 78.0%) and the prespecified noninferiority criteria were not met. In a post hoc analysis using an alternate widely accepted threshold of 10 IU/mL, the noninferiority criteria were met (93.4% vs 89.8%). Concomitant administration with Priorix did not affect the overall influenza protection rate of LAIV (78.4% and 63.8% against antigenically similar influenza strains and any strain, respectively).
More Related Videos
10:39Intranasal Administration of Recombinant Influenza Vaccines in Chimeric Mouse Models to Study Mucosal Immunity
Published on: June 25, 2015
09:37Detection of Polyfunctional T Cells in Children Vaccinated with Japanese Encephalitis Vaccine via the Flow Cytometry Technique
Published on: September 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Influenza
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Poliomyelitis