Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction
1Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 430 Tobin Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA. astaub@psych.umass.edu
Abstract:
Speakers are known to make subject-verb agreement errors both when a number-mismatching noun intervenes between the head of the subject phrase and the verb (e.g., *The key to the cabinets are on the table) and in configurations in which there is a number-mismatching noun that does not intervene (e.g., *The cabinets that the key open are on the second floor). Using a two-choice response time (RT) paradigm, Staub (2009) found that correct agreement decisions were also slowed in both cases. The present article reports a new experiment designed to explore whether these two RT effects are qualitatively similar or different. Fitting of the ex-Gaussian distribution (Ratcliff, 1979) to individual subjects' RT data, in each condition, demonstrated that the effect of an intervening number attractor on correct RT is due to both a shifting of the distribution to the right and to increased skewing, while the effect of a non-intervening attractor is almost entirely a skewing effect. A non-parametric vincentizing procedure supported these conclusions. These findings are taken to support the view that these two types of number attraction involve distinct processing mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity
Factors Influencing Attraction III: Similarity
Sampling Distribution
Factorial Design
Choosing Between z and t Distribution
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity

