Autism Spectrum Disorder
Self-Schemas
Understanding Self-Concept
Modeling in Therapy
Understanding the Self
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
Published on: July 31, 2016
Michael V Lombardo1, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Edward T Bullmore
1Autism Research Centre, Douglas House, Cambridge CB2 8AH, UK. ml437@cam.ac.uk
This study examines how the brain processes information about the self versus others in adults with autism. Researchers found that individuals with autism show atypical brain activity in regions usually dedicated to self-reflection, which correlates with their early social development.
Area of Science:
Background:
No prior work had fully resolved how distinct neural patterns contribute to social cognitive deficits in autism spectrum conditions. It was already known that the self represents a multifaceted concept shaped by social interactions. Prior research has shown that individuals on the spectrum struggle with both self-referential and other-referential cognitive tasks. That uncertainty drove researchers to investigate whether abnormal brain activity during self-processing underlies these observed social challenges. This gap motivated a closer look at how specific cortical regions distinguish between the self and others. Previous studies often focused on general social deficits rather than the specific neural architecture of self-representation. Understanding these biological markers remains a challenge for the field of developmental psychology. This investigation seeks to clarify the neural basis of these complex behavioral differences.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this research is to investigate whether atypical neural self-representation explains social cognitive impairments in autism. Researchers sought to determine if the brain processes self-referential information differently in individuals with autism compared to neurotypical controls. This study addresses the hypothesis that abnormal neural activity in specific cortical regions underlies observed difficulties in social interaction. The motivation stems from the need to understand the biological basis of self-referential and other-referential processing deficits. By comparing these groups, the authors intended to isolate the neural circuitry responsible for self-coding. The study explores how these neural patterns relate to documented early childhood social challenges. Identifying these mechanisms could clarify why individuals on the spectrum struggle with complex social tasks. This work provides a foundation for linking internal cognitive processes to external behavioral outcomes.
Main Methods:
Review approach involved scanning adult males with autism spectrum conditions alongside matched neurotypical controls. Participants performed reflective mentalizing or physical judgments about themselves or the British Queen. Researchers utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging to capture real-time brain activity during these cognitive tasks. This approach allowed for the direct comparison of hemodynamic responses between the two study groups. The team analyzed activation patterns within the middle cingulate cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. They also examined functional connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and areas associated with embodied representations. Statistical models assessed the relationship between neural distinction magnitudes and historical social impairment data. This design ensured that observed differences were specific to self-referential processing rather than general task performance.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature demonstrate that neurotypical individuals preferentially recruit the middle cingulate cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex for self-referential processing. In contrast, the autism group showed equal ventromedial prefrontal cortex responses to both self and other stimuli. The middle cingulate cortex in the autism group responded more strongly to other-mentalizing than to self-mentalizing. These atypical responses occurred exclusively in regions typically dedicated to self-information. Areas preferentially responding to other-referential information remained unaffected in the autism group. Reduced functional connectivity appeared between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and regions like the ventral premotor and somatosensory cortex. A strong correlation existed between the magnitude of neural self-other distinction and early childhood social impairment scores. Participants with the largest neural distinction were the least socially impaired, while those with minimal distinction were the most impaired.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that atypical organization of neural circuitry coding for self-information serves as a primary mechanism for social impairments. Synthesis and implications suggest that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex plays a role in distinguishing self from others. Their findings indicate that this specific distinction correlates with the severity of early childhood social challenges. Individuals showing the largest neural distinction between self and other experienced the fewest social difficulties. Conversely, those exhibiting minimal neural differentiation faced the most significant social hurdles during their early development. The data demonstrate that these atypical responses remain localized to regions typically reserved for self-referential processing. Other areas dedicated to processing external information appear unaffected by these specific neural deviations. This work highlights the importance of self-representation in the broader context of social cognitive development.
The researchers propose that atypical neural self-representation, specifically in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, drives social cognitive impairments. While neurotypical adults show distinct activation for self versus others, individuals with autism exhibit reduced differentiation, which directly correlates with their early childhood social development scores.
The study utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging to monitor brain activity. This tool allowed the team to compare hemodynamic responses in adult males with autism against age-matched and IQ-matched neurotypical controls during specific mentalizing tasks.
The middle cingulate cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex are necessary for preferential self-referential processing in neurotypical individuals. In contrast, the autism group showed equal activation for self and other in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, indicating a failure to distinguish between these two categories.
Functional connectivity data revealed reduced communication between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and regions linked to embodied representations. Specifically, the ventral premotor and somatosensory cortex showed weaker integration in the autism group compared to the neurotypical participants.
The researchers measured the magnitude of neural self-other distinction during reflective mentalizing judgments. They found that participants who made the largest distinction in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex were the least socially impaired, whereas those with little distinction were the most impaired.
The authors suggest that their findings provide a biological basis for understanding the nature of social cognitive deficits. They imply that the atypical organization of self-coding circuitry is a core feature that links internal self-perception to broader social interaction difficulties.