Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Oculocardiac Reflex During Strabismus Surgery: Conjunctival Incision versus Standardized Rectus Muscle Traction.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026

Same author

Reply to Comment on: Safety and efficiency reducing ROP guideline sensitivity: An external validation using a large US-based dataset.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026

Same author

How Race and Birthweight May Influence Gender Differences in Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Same author

Safety and Efficiency Reducing Retinopathy of Prematurity Guideline Sensitivity: An External Validation Using a Large US-based Dataset.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026

Same author

Estimating the Prevalence and Severity of Isolated Small-Angle Strabismic Amblyopia.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025

Same author

Comparative Validation of MOPTIM MRT-200 Refraction Device with 2WIN and Retinomax.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

Comparison between the plusoptiX and MTI Photoscreeners.

Noelle S Matta¹, Robert W Arnold, Eric L Singman

¹CO, CRC, COT, Family Eye Group, 2110 Harrisburg Pike, Ste 215, Lancaster, PA 17601, USA. NoelleMatta@gmail.com

Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)

|December 17, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The plusoptiX photoscreener demonstrated superior sensitivity and specificity in detecting amblyogenic risk factors compared to the MTI device. This digital tool offers improved accuracy for pediatric vision screening programs.

More Related Videos

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Published on: January 12, 2013

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Using an Automated Hirschberg Test App to Evaluate Ocular Alignment

Published on: March 24, 2020

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Near Infrared Optical Projection Tomography for Assessments of β-cell Mass Distribution in Diabetes Research

Published on: January 12, 2013

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Pediatric Optometry
Medical Technology Evaluation

Background:

Childhood amblyopia poses a significant vision threat.
Accurate screening for amblyogenic risk factors is crucial for early intervention.
The Medical Technology and Innovations (MTI) photoscreener is established, but the digital plusoptiX offers a modern alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the diagnostic performance of the MTI and plusoptiX photoscreeners.
To evaluate their ability to detect amblyogenic risk factors against a gold standard pediatric ophthalmic examination.
To inform the selection of devices for community vision screening.

Main Methods:

A consecutive series of 151 children underwent screening with both MTI and plusoptiX devices.
Screenings were performed on the same day as a comprehensive pediatric ophthalmic examination.
MTI results were interpreted by a masked expert, while plusoptiX results used automated software analysis.

Main Results:

The comprehensive examination identified amblyopia or risk factors in 65% of children.
MTI showed 83.6% sensitivity and 90.5% specificity.
plusoptiX achieved higher performance with 98.9% sensitivity and 96.1% specificity.

Conclusions:

Both MTI and plusoptiX are effective screening tools when validated against a cycloplegic pediatric ophthalmic examination.
The plusoptiX photoscreener exhibits significantly higher sensitivity and specificity.
The findings support the use of plusoptiX in enhancing the accuracy of pediatric vision screening.