Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) with Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Continuous deep sedation until death: palliation or physician-assisted death?
Mohamed Y Rady1, Joseph L Verheijde
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. Rady.Mohamed@mayo.edu
Continuous deep sedation until death, unlike palliative care, predictably shortens life by suppressing vital centers. This practice, often debated for end-of-life suffering, should be recognized as physician-assisted death, not palliation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Palliative Care
- Clinical Pharmacology
Background:
- Distinguishing between palliative sedation and continuous deep sedation until death is crucial for ethical end-of-life care.
- Published literature lacks clarity on the effects of continuous deep sedation compared to standard palliative sedation.
- Continuous deep sedation is controversial, particularly when used for existential suffering or elective death requests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To differentiate the effects of continuous deep sedation until death from palliative sedation aimed at relieving distress.
- To analyze whether continuous deep sedation aligns with the principle of double effect in end-of-life care.
- To re-characterize continuous deep sedation in the context of physician-assisted death.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and ethical analysis of pharmacologically induced continuous deep sedation.
- Comparison of continuous deep sedation with common sedation practices for symptom relief in the final conscious phase of dying.
- Application of the principle of double effect to evaluate the intent and outcomes of continuous deep sedation.
Main Results:
- Continuous deep sedation predictably suppresses brainstem vital centers, leading to a life-shortening effect.
- The practice induces a permanent coma, which contravenes the double-effect principle due to its intended outcome and predictable consequences.
- Continuous deep sedation differs significantly from palliative sedation used to alleviate suffering in conscious patients.
Conclusions:
- Continuous deep sedation until death should not be equated with palliative care; it is ethically distinct and life-shortening.
- The practice contravenes the principle of double effect, as the intent to induce coma and the predictable life-shortening effect are primary.
- Continuous deep sedation should be classified as a form of physician-assisted death rather than a palliative measure.
Related Concept Videos
Stages of General Anesthesia
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Continuing Care
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics

