Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Frames: Problem Solving II01:26

Frames: Problem Solving II

Consider a hydraulic hoist supporting a load of 1 kN. Assuming a simplified schematic representation of this frame structure, the force acting on BD and BF members can be determined.
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
Vector Functions and Motion: Problem Solving01:30

Vector Functions and Motion: Problem Solving

Accurate position tracking is fundamental to the safe and effective operation of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), particularly during precision maneuvers near complex structures. In this scenario, a drone is programmed to perform a high-precision inspection of a vertical structure, starting at position ((x, y, z) = (3, 0, 0)), with an initial velocity oriented in the positive z-direction. The trajectory of the drone is governed by a time-dependent acceleration function a(t), which is predefined...
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving01:16

Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving

Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regime shift detection and neurocomputational substrates for under and overreactions to change.

eLife·2026
Same author

Novel bispecific monoclonal antibody-based dual-analyte immunochromatographic strip for the detection of aflatoxin B1 and ochratoxin A in cereal samples.

Food chemistry·2025
Same author

An equivalent illuminant analysis of lightness constancy with physical objects and in virtual reality.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Novel antibody- and aptamer-based approaches for sensitive detection of mycotoxin fusaric acid in cereal.

Food chemistry·2024
Same author

Dissecting Bayes: Using influence measures to test normative use of probability density information derived from a sample.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

A comparison of human and GPT-4 use of probabilistic phrases in a coordination game.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

Thymidylate synthase inhibitory drugs induce p53-dependent pathways differently.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Top-down and bottom-up attention for joint pattern classification and reconstruction.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Short- and long-term scaling behavior of blood pressure and pulse arrival time during sleep in healthy controls and patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Double DQN-based secrecy energy efficiency and fairness performance in IRS-assisted NOMA systems with friendly jamming.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

10 recommendations for strengthening citizen science for improved societal and ecological outcomes: A co-produced analysis of challenges and opportunities in the 21st century.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Paying in public: Peer effects, impression management, and willingness to pay on digital payment platforms.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Sub-optimal allocation of time in sequential movements.

Shih-Wei Wu1, Maria F Dal Martello, Laurence T Maloney

  • 1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America. shihwei@caltech.edu

Plos One
|December 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human subjects planning sequential movements, like reaching two targets, did not optimally allocate their limited time to maximize rewards. Even with higher rewards for the second target, participants spent too much time on the first movement.

More Related Videos

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
08:19

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion

Published on: January 15, 2016

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
08:19

Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion

Published on: January 15, 2016

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Organisms must allocate limited resources, such as time and energy, for complex actions.
  • Previous research on movement planning primarily focused on single, isolated movements, neglecting sequential actions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate how humans allocate time when planning sequential movements to maximize monetary rewards.
  • Develop and test a model of the speed-accuracy tradeoff for sequential movements.

Main Methods:

  • Human subjects performed a pointing task involving two sequential targets within a time limit.
  • Monetary rewards, movement angles, and movement lengths were varied across experimental conditions.
  • A model predicting optimal time allocation to maximize expected gain was developed and compared to human performance.

Main Results:

  • Subjects consistently allocated more time to the first movement than predicted by the optimal model, even when the second target offered significantly higher rewards.
  • Human performance in time allocation was suboptimal across all tested conditions.
  • The developed model successfully predicted subjects' time allocation patterns.

Conclusions:

  • The human movement planning system does not appear to maximize expected reward when planning sequences of even two movements.
  • Findings suggest potential limitations in the neural mechanisms underlying reward-based movement planning and resource allocation.
  • Results offer insights into the interplay between motor control, decision-making, and economic principles in sequential task performance.