A phase II study of everolimus in combination with imatinib for previously treated advanced renal carcinoma

Christopher W Ryan1, Jacqueline Vuky, Joseph S Chan

  • 1Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR 97239, USA. ryanc@ohsu.edu

Investigational New Drugs
|December 17, 2009
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study found that combining everolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) with imatinib (a PDGFR inhibitor) did not sufficiently improve progression-free survival in advanced renal carcinoma patients. Further investigation of this combination is not recommended.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Advanced renal carcinoma presents a significant treatment challenge.
  • Targeted therapies, including mTOR and PDGFR inhibitors, are crucial in managing renal cell carcinoma.
  • Combinatorial approaches are being explored to overcome treatment resistance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of combining everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) with imatinib (PDGFR inhibitor) in previously treated advanced renal carcinoma patients.
  • To determine the 3-month progression-free rate as the primary endpoint for this combination therapy.

Main Methods:

  • A phase II clinical trial was conducted involving patients with metastatic or unresectable clear cell renal carcinoma.
  • Patients had received at least one prior systemic therapy but no prior mTOR inhibitor therapy.
  • Treatment involved daily oral administration of everolimus (2.5 mg) and imatinib (600 mg).

Main Results:

  • The study was terminated early due to insufficient patients achieving 3-month progression-free status.
  • The 3-month progression-free rate was 49% (95% CI 23%, 72%).
  • Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 1.9, 6.2), with common toxicities including nausea, elevated creatinine, edema, and fatigue.

Conclusions:

  • The combination of everolimus and imatinib did not achieve a sufficient 3-month progression-free rate in previously treated advanced renal carcinoma patients.
  • This combination therapy is not recommended for further investigation in this patient population.

Related Concept Videos

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Treatment Resistent Cancers02:56

Treatment Resistent Cancers

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. A cancer cell is genetically unstable and hence can mutate faster. They can also modify their microenvironment and escape immune surveillance. The difficulties in treating cancer are further compounded by the emergence of rapid resistance to anticancer drugs. The most common ways to attain resistance in cancer cells include alteration in drug transport and metabolism, modification of drug target, elevated DNA damage response, or...