Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Carboplatin May Be an Effective and Tolerable Treatment Option for Platinum-Sensitive Pancreatic Cancer Patients With Pre-existing Neuropathy.

Cureus·2026
Same author

The Food and Microbiome Longitudinal Investigation (FAMiLI) Study: an Asian American (AsA) Enriched Multi-ethnic Environmental Cohort.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

"Is more better?": association of intra-abdominal esophageal length in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with recurrent hiatal hernia.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same author

Efficacy of a language-concordant community health worker intervention to improve community-to-clinic linkage for dementia care: results of the randomized trial PLAN.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Performance of fecal inflammatory biomarkers to identify watery shigellosis: Findings from the Enterics for Global Health (EFGH) Shigella surveillance study.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2026
Same author

Activity restriction after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology·2026
Same journal

Fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty for complex anal fistulas: Should we be concerned about incontinence?

Surgery·2026
Same journal

No need for mesh in the repair of hiatal hernias: Autologous tissue hiatoplasty techniques for the repair of the complex diaphragmatic defect.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Incretin-based therapies and altered myocardial metabolism in a swine model of ischemic heart disease in the setting of metabolic syndrome.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Colonoscopy utilization and persistent disparities in early onset colorectal cancer: A multistate, multi-institution nested case-control study.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Preoperative risk assessment for surgical operations using artificial intelligence: Potential benefits, hurdles, and future directions.

Surgery·2026
Same journal

Perioperative outcomes of neoadjuvant immunochemoradiotherapy versus immunochemotherapy followed by surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Surgery·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

Methodologies for establishing validity in surgical simulation studies.

Sara S Van Nortwick1, Thomas S Lendvay, Aaron R Jensen

  • 1Institute for Simulation and Interprofessional Studies (ISIS), Seattle Children's, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Surgery
|December 18, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rigorous validation of surgical simulation tools is essential for objective skill assessment. This review highlights common methodological shortcomings and proposes criteria for robust validation studies in surgical simulation training.

More Related Videos

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
08:08

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery

Published on: May 6, 2020

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
06:48

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum

Published on: May 20, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Simulation
  • Assessment Tool Validation

Background:

  • Objective skill measurement in surgical simulation training relies on validated assessment tools.
  • Existing reviews often lack clear methodologies for rigorous validation studies.
  • This study identifies current approaches and proposes benchmark criteria for surgical simulation validity studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review current methodological approaches in surgical simulation validation studies.
  • To propose benchmark criteria for establishing validity in surgical simulation research.
  • To address the lack of standardized validation methodologies in the field.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of studies on validity in surgical simulation and technical skills.
  • PubMed search using keywords: "validity/validation," "simulation," "surgery," and "technical skills."
  • Tabulation of 29 methodological variables by two independent reviewers.

Main Results:

  • Eighty-three studies were reviewed, primarily focusing on construct validity (60%).
  • Less than half (45%) reported reliability data; most studies (82%) were single-institution with small sample sizes.
  • Methodological inconsistencies included lack of task selection rationale (50%) and evaluator blinding (34% of human-evaluator studies).

Conclusions:

  • Typical validation studies in surgical simulation suffer from small sample sizes, lack of methodological rigor, and potential bias.
  • The absence of standardized validation methods complicates the selection of appropriate tools for training centers.
  • Establishing clear criteria is crucial for advancing the reliability and applicability of surgical simulation assessments.