Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
Published on: November 3, 2010
Armitage's trend test for genome-wide association analysis: one-sided or two-sided?
Yixin Fang1, Yuanjia Wang, Nanshi Sha
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, 750 COE, 7th Floor, 30 Pryor Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA. matyxf@langate.gsu.edu.
Population stratification confounds genome-wide association studies. Armitage's trend test, using one-sided or two-sided hypotheses, identified significant rheumatoid arthritis SNPs, with one-sided tests aligning with combined sample results.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Epidemiology
- Statistical Genetics
Background:
- Population stratification is a key confounder in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using case-control designs.
- Armitage's trend test and related methods offer partial correction for population stratification.
- The choice between one-sided and two-sided alternative hypotheses in these tests warrants further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of one-sided versus two-sided alternative hypotheses in Armitage's trend test for identifying genetic associations.
- To assess the impact of population stratification on rheumatoid arthritis genetic association findings.
- To compare results from individual hypothesis tests with those from combined sample analyses.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Armitage's trend test on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from chromosome 9, focusing on the TRAF1-C5 locus.
- Applied both one-sided and two-sided alternative hypotheses to analyze the dataset from Genetic Analysis Workshop 16.
- Compared findings with results from a combined sample of the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC) and the Swedish Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis (EIRA).
Main Results:
- The two-sided hypothesis identified significant associations for SNPs rs12380341 and rs872863, and six other SNPs in the TRAF1-C5 locus.
- The one-sided hypothesis (minor allele positively associated with disease) revealed significant associations only for the six TRAF1-C5 locus SNPs.
- Results from the one-sided hypothesis testing were consistent with the combined NARAC/EIRA sample findings.
Conclusions:
- The choice of hypothesis testing (one-sided vs. two-sided) impacts the identification of significant SNPs in genome-wide association studies.
- One-sided hypothesis testing, specifically for a positive association of the minor allele, provided results consistent with combined population data for rheumatoid arthritis.
- Armitage's trend test is a valuable tool for addressing population stratification in genetic association studies, with careful consideration of hypothesis formulation.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
Significance Testing: Overview
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in value between...
Test for Homogeneity
