Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Look who is calling: a comparison of genotype calling algorithms
Maren Vens1, Arne Schillert, Inke R König
1Institut für Medizinische Biometrie und Statistik, Universität zu Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany. maren.vens@imbs.uni-luebeck.de.
This study compared genotype calling algorithms (GCAs) for genome-wide association studies. JAPL and Chiamo++ are recommended for retaining subjects and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Bioinformatics
- Statistical Genomics
Background:
- Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) require accurate genotype calling for robust statistical analysis.
- Various genotype calling algorithms (GCAs) exist, each with potential impacts on data quality and sample/marker retention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of three GCAs: Bayesian robust linear modeling using Mahalanobis distance (BRLMM), Chiamo++, and JAPL.
- To evaluate their effectiveness in standard quality control (sQC) and identify potential errors in genotype data.
Main Methods:
- Utilized autosomal single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the Framingham Heart Study 500k Affymetrix Array data.
- Applied standard quality control (sQC) procedures to genotypes called by BRLMM, Chiamo++, and JAPL.
- Assessed genotype concordance between algorithms to detect errors.
Main Results:
- JAPL retained the most individuals for analysis.
- Chiamo++ achieved the highest number of SNPs passing sQC, while BRLMM had the lowest.
- All three GCAs met sQC criteria for 79% of SNPs, but at least one GCA failed sQC for 18% of SNPs.
- Comparison revealed previously undetected strand coding errors.
Conclusions:
- JAPL is recommended when maximizing subject retention is the priority.
- Chiamo++ is preferred for maximizing the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) passing quality control.
- Algorithm choice impacts data validity and error detection in GWAS.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Sanger Sequencing
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles, which...
