Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brain activity as a candidate biomarker for personalised caffeine treatment in premature neonates.

Frontiers in pediatrics·2026
Same author

Neural correlates underlying high-frequency stimulation-induced secondary hyperalgesia in humans.

Pain reports·2025
Same author

Trust and mistrust in law enforcement by formerly incarcerated persons: Effects on Miranda reasoning using a mixed-methods design.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Psychiatric Diagnostic Screening Questionnaire (PDSQ): Psychometric Properties and Item-Level Empirical Correlates.

Clinical psychology & psychotherapy·2025
Same author

Advancing Detection Strategies for Feigned Mental Disorders Across the Decades.

Behavioral sciences & the law·2025
Same author

Challenges and Opportunities for Forensic Mental Health in Immigration Courts.

The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.

Richard Rogers1, Jill Johansson-Love

  • 1University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA. rogersr@unt.edu

The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|December 19, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reviews three competency measures for criminal adjudication using Daubert guidelines. It recommends integrating clinical insights with standardized data for evidence-based competency evaluations.

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychology
  • Legal Psychology
  • Psychological Assessment

Background:

  • Competency to stand trial evaluations have a long history of standardized assessment since the 1970s.
  • Forensic practitioners have historically been divided on the acceptance of competency measures.
  • Evidence-based forensic practice necessitates rigorous evaluation of assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine three published competency measures: MacCAT-CA, ECST-R, and CAST-MR.
  • To evaluate these measures using the Daubert guidelines, focusing on relevance to the Dusky standard, error rates, and classification rates.
  • To advocate for an integrated approach in competency determinations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of three standardized competency measures: MacCAT-CA, ECST-R, and CAST-MR.
  • Application of the Daubert guidelines for evaluating scientific validity and reliability.
  • Analysis of relevance to the Dusky standard, error rates, and classification rates for each measure.

Main Results:

  • The study critically examined the MacCAT-CA, ECST-R, and CAST-MR.
  • Evaluation focused on adherence to the Dusky standard and statistical performance metrics.
  • Acknowledged historical debates regarding the utility of standardized competency measures.

Conclusions:

  • No valuable information, whether from clinical judgment or standardized data, should be disregarded.
  • Recommends integrating competency interview findings with diverse data sources.
  • Advocates for evidence-based competency determinations aligned with the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Practice Guideline.