Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
05:42

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement

Published on: September 13, 2022

Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement.

Jörg Neugebauer1, Gerhard Stachulla, Lutz Ritter

  • 1University to Cologne, Consultant at Interdisciplinary Outpatient Department for Oral Surgery and Implantology, Kerpener Strasse 32, 50931 Köln, Germany. joerg.neugebauer@uk-koeln.de

Expert Review of Medical Devices
|December 22, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-Surgical and Surgical Management of Peri-Implant Diseases and Defects in Zirconia Implants: A Scoping Review.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same author

Effect of Progressive Versus Standard Implant Thread Designs on Primary Stability and Insertion Torque: An In Vitro Study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same author

Macro-Dipole-Constrained Learning of Atomic Charges for Accurate Electrostatic Potentials at Electrochemical Interfaces.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

In Situ EC-EPR Spectroscopy and DFT Analysis of H<sub>UPD</sub> on Polycrystalline Pt.

ChemSusChem·2026
Same author

User-Defined Electrostatic Potentials in DFT Supercell Calculations: Implementation and Application to Electrified Interfaces.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same author

Consensus Report of Group 2 of the 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Zygomatic, Standard-Length, and Short Implant-Supported Prostheses.

Clinical oral implants research·2026

Dental implant surgery is advancing with ConeBeam computed tomography (CBCT) and planning software. While surgical guides offer accuracy, a learning curve exists for dentists, impacting treatment efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Dental implant treatments aim to reduce procedure duration and patient recovery time.
  • ConeBeam computed tomography (CBCT) enhances 3D dental diagnostics, enabling precise pre-surgical planning for implant placement based on prosthetic needs.
  • Advancements in implant planning software now cater specifically to CBCT data, moving beyond earlier multislice computed tomography (CT) systems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the role of advanced imaging and planning software in modern dental implantology.
  • To assess the clinical applicability and accuracy of guided implant placement techniques.
  • To discuss the impact of digital workflows on traditional laboratory processes in prosthodontics.

Main Methods:

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
05:42

Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement

Published on: September 13, 2022

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

  • Utilized ConeBeam computed tomography (CBCT) for detailed 3D dental diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Compared implant placement using surgical guides versus optical tracking systems.
  • Analyzed the necessity of specialized abutments or workflow adjustments for prefabricated superstructures in flapless surgery.

    • Main Results:

    • Both surgical guides and optical tracking systems demonstrate clinically acceptable accuracy for implant placement, even in challenging anatomical locations.
    • Misfits ranging from 150 to 600 micrometers necessitate workflow adjustments or special abutments when using prefabricated superstructures and flapless techniques.
    • The effectiveness of surgical guides for inexperienced dentists is limited due to a distinct learning curve associated with guided surgery.

    Conclusions:

    • Digital planning and guided surgery are integral to contemporary implant dentistry, improving precision and potentially reducing treatment time.
    • While accurate, guided implant placement requires specific training, challenging the notion of simplifying complex procedures for novice practitioners.
    • Future developments will likely further automate laboratory work by integrating superstructure fabrication into the initial virtual treatment planning stages.