Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tapping in Synchrony With Beat Enhances Groove Sensation.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

Effects of omission probability on omitted stimulus potentials.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Beyond the baby schema: Objects being touched are perceived to be cute.

PloS one·2026
Same author

A Comprehensive Analysis of Serum and Urine Bile Acid Profiles in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Exploratory Study of Clinical Associations.

Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)·2026
Same author

Postoperative gut dysbiosis in biliary atresia patients treated by portoenterostomy or liver transplantation.

Pediatric surgery international·2025
Same author

Early diagnosis of Zellweger syndrome through a Nationwide Liver Disease Registry System (CIRCLe).

Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay.

Mio Iwanaga1, Hiroshi Nittono

  • 1Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan.

Psychophysiology
|December 25, 2009
PubMed
Summary

People find it hard to ignore the consequences of their voluntary actions. Unexpected action outcomes, like mismatched tones, disrupt task performance and alter brain activity measured by event-related potentials (ERPs).

More Related Videos

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
08:26

Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Published on: January 11, 2016

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
05:04

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children

Published on: October 4, 2018

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Understanding how individuals process and react to the consequences of their voluntary actions is crucial in cognitive science.
  • Voluntary actions often have predictable outcomes, and deviations from these expectations can impact cognitive processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the perception of action consequences.
  • To examine how unexpected action outcomes affect cognitive processing and task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a self-paced, two-choice random generation task.
  • Participants performed a task involving button presses associated with specific tones, with occasional unexpected tone-action pairings introduced.

Main Results:

  • Cognitively mismatched tones, deviating from expected action outcomes, elicited significant ERP components (N2, P3, late positive potential).
  • These unexpected outcomes also led to a delay in the timing of subsequent voluntary actions.

Conclusions:

  • Action effects are difficult for individuals to disregard, even when deemed irrelevant.
  • Deviations from expected action-outcome relationships can disrupt ongoing tasks and indicate cognitive processing of action consequences.