Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Published on: February 9, 2011
Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections in dogs
Meredith C Faires1, Michelle Traverse, Kathy C Tater
1Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada. mfaires@uoguelph.ca
Abstract:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a pathogen of animals. To compare types of infections, clinical outcomes, and risk factors associated with MRSA in dogs with those associated with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections, we conducted a case-control study at 3 veterinary referral hospitals in the United States and Canada during 2001-2007. Risk factors analyzed were signalment, medical and surgical history, and infection site. Among 40 dogs with MRSA and 80 with MSSA infections, highest prevalence of both infections was found in skin and ears. Although most (92.3%) dogs with MRSA infections were discharged from the hospital, we found that significant risk factors for MRSA infection were receipt of antimicrobial drugs (odds ratio [OR] 3.84, p = 0.02), Beta-lactams (OR 3.58, p = 0.04), or fluoroquinolones (OR 5.34, p = 0.01), and intravenous catheterization (OR 3.72, p = 0.02). Prudent use of antimicrobial drugs in veterinary hospitals is advised.
Insights
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a growing concern in veterinary medicine. Risk factors for MRSA in dogs include prior antimicrobial and fluoroquinolone drug use, and intravenous catheterization.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Infectious Diseases
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasingly recognized as a significant pathogen in animal populations.
- Understanding the differences between MRSA and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections in dogs is crucial for effective treatment and control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare infection types, clinical outcomes, and risk factors for MRSA versus MSSA in dogs.
- To identify specific risk factors associated with MRSA infections in a canine population.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study was conducted from 2001-2007 across 3 veterinary referral hospitals in the US and Canada.
- Analyzed signalment, medical/surgical history, and infection sites in 40 dogs with MRSA and 80 dogs with MSSA.
- Statistical analysis identified significant risk factors for MRSA acquisition.
Main Results:
- Skin and ear infections were most prevalent for both MRSA and MSSA.
- Most dogs (92.3%) with MRSA were discharged.
- Significant risk factors for MRSA included prior antimicrobial drugs (OR 3.84), Beta-lactams (OR 3.58), fluoroquinolones (OR 5.34), and IV catheterization (OR 3.72).
Conclusions:
- Antimicrobial drug use, particularly Beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones, and intravenous catheterization are significant risk factors for MRSA in dogs.
- Prudent antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary settings is strongly advised to mitigate MRSA spread.
- Further research into MRSA pathogenesis and prevention in animals is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
